my tv broke wrote:
I downvoted that image, because the colour of the voting arrow needs to match Toovey's face
NRL Fantasy Fanatics - A place for discussion of NRL Fantasy / Virtual Sports / Super Coach and other Fantasy Sports
my tv broke wrote:
Mulvy wrote:
That might evntually happen, but with Smith named at 14 and the make up of the bench, doesn't that signal Holbrook's intent to play Clark for no less than 65 minutes to start the season? I know that may change now with Brimson in doubt, but with the team as written and Smith not a hooker, good signs for Clark to start the season no?
Milchcow wrote:
For me, Billy Walters is the trap that is most enticing in nature. So want to pull the trigger on him
Wish I could see team lists for the next few week in advance.
Hey mate what are you thinking re hooker!my tv broke wrote:
I've rotated through these three constantly. Can't land on anything definitive. There isn't even a round 13 player there to use as something to split the decision. Honestly if i could 'lock' a player into a position and not be able to touch it, i'd do it, just so i stop mulling it.
Ipap and Crichton do have DPP which could be handy.
No D. Fifi mate?The Goat Boys wrote:
I think I`m leaning Haas/Ipap with Crichton in 3rd but who knows what I end up with.
I would also use that function would save alot of stress.
ytsb wrote:I have a feeling that Proctor will spell Fifita, who will play 65 mins. Titans already have two mids, unsure how proctor fits into that middle rotation meaningfully. Is fifita best used as a 65min player than an 80 mins player? Would be interested to hear some insights
Rabbits21 wrote:
Hey mate what are you thinking re hooker!
I’m stuck I’ve been through Mahoney, Grant, Cheese and Clark rotating.
my tv broke wrote:
haha i just posted some comments from Holbrook - see above.
Finch wrote:Probably been discussed in the pre season, but here's some stats from Zero Tackle, top offloads last year. Offloads to the hand worth 4 points each now, so could be some value in here.
I have added TPJ to my team because of it...
https://www.zerotackle.com/rugby-league/player-stats/2021-nrl-top-offloads/
ytsb wrote:
I saw the same comments, could be interpreted two ways. Proctor is there as a MID, but in case of emergency can cover edge (giving him value over Walalce) or Proctor is there to play both mid and edge.
What is your interpretation?
my tv broke wrote:
I've rotated through these three constantly. Can't land on anything definitive. There isn't even a round 13 player there to use as something to split the decision. Honestly if i could 'lock' a player into a position and not be able to touch it, i'd do it, just so i stop mulling it.
Ipap and Crichton do have DPP which could be handy.
StormTrooper96 wrote:
I like the gamble. I am placing him in my NPR's and hoping he holds down the spot long term. I know Kevvy needs to win games and Gamble/Kelly failed last year. I also personally think Billy suits Reynolds game better and has the better long term prospects.
At 240K I will take the risk.
my tv broke wrote:
I get RICKY concerns but RICKY also thinks Hudson Young is an origin player in the making. Anyway, not trying to convince anyone. My gut says he's locked into the left edge. He has played 80 every time he has started at 2nd row in the last two years. Its just a price point issue for me.
Hodgson combining with Starling and Whitehead (likely) not an 80 min lock is good for their edges playing big mins.
robelgordo wrote:
I had him in my first draft for about 5 secs, but didn't have the guts to stick with it. I think he's top of the pecking order for the edge now, expect he'll play 80.
TheWeapon wrote:
This makes Nofo look a bit more appealing too....