Anyone know what the job security is like on Nathan Green?
2016 NRL.com Fantasy Thread Part 9
Beast From The Big East- Posts : 1654
Reputation : 101
Join date : 2015-09-21
- Post n°361
Re: 2016 NRL.com Fantasy Thread Part 9
Asked on a previous page but got no response so will try again.
Anyone know what the job security is like on Nathan Green?
Anyone know what the job security is like on Nathan Green?
charliemurphy- Posts : 279
Reputation : 29
Join date : 2016-02-04
- Post n°362
Re: 2016 NRL.com Fantasy Thread Part 9
morethanjustakeyboard wrote:Hodgson > Peats? Other hooker is Lichaa btw
Pro
No funny business with Austin and Baptiste
Con
66k
Peats is a gun. Sticky can't be trusted.
Consider the 66k an insurance policy.
Welshy- Moderator
- Posts : 27249
Reputation : 10988
Join date : 2015-09-16
Age : 37
Location : Wales
- Post n°363
Re: 2016 NRL.com Fantasy Thread Part 9
Beast From The Big East wrote:Asked on a previous page but got no response so will try again.
Anyone know what the job security is like on Nathan Green?
tough with Buhrer only a few rounds away, think that's a straight swap
Milchcow- Moderator
- Posts : 25395
Reputation : 17817
Join date : 2015-07-31
- Post n°364
Re: 2016 NRL.com Fantasy Thread Part 9
GoingNuts wrote:
Yeah I remember him pumping out some massive scores for manly when he was in the halves. I guess if he doesn't play any more games he wont see the price rises. Hmmm.. cheers for your thoughts.
Price rises from the start.
I have toyed with the idea of starting Littlejohn. When he plays he scores big, if Moses/Brooks go down he'll get a start.
And if not, he'll be out of the team completely, so no money, but no bad AE and no leaking money.
Guys like Benry, Paasi, Green might make money for 1-2 weeks then get dumped to the bench and require immediate tradeout or you'll just lose the cash they made at the start as they start posting rubbish scores from 20 minute bench roles
charliemurphy- Posts : 279
Reputation : 29
Join date : 2016-02-04
- Post n°365
Re: 2016 NRL.com Fantasy Thread Part 9
Any got an opinion on D. Fifita? Was a gun in the 9's and surely should be able to oust Taga for that starting spot. Impact off the bench?
Beast From The Big East- Posts : 1654
Reputation : 101
Join date : 2015-09-21
- Post n°366
Re: 2016 NRL.com Fantasy Thread Part 9
Welshy wrote:
tough with Buhrer only a few rounds away, think that's a straight swap
that's what I'm thinking but even then he surely just goes to the bench. really wanting to fit in Aubo but the only way I think I can do it is to downgrade McGuire to Evans and I'm not sold on that
Milchcow- Moderator
- Posts : 25395
Reputation : 17817
Join date : 2015-07-31
- Post n°367
Re: 2016 NRL.com Fantasy Thread Part 9
Beast From The Big East wrote:Asked on a previous page but got no response so will try again.
Anyone know what the job security is like on Nathan Green?
Buhrer is injured.
Other contenders like Leary/Mateo/Symonds are named on the bench or NSW Cup so looks like he is there on form and its his spot to lose.
Don't rate his odds for big minutes, think he might play a short role at the start before Mateo comes on to do his stuff.
I do like him a lot more than Benry though
Spectre- Posts : 3196
Reputation : 530
Join date : 2015-12-14
- Post n°368
Re: 2016 NRL.com Fantasy Thread Part 9
Mateo should take a big money contract from the super league and fuck right off
Milchcow- Moderator
- Posts : 25395
Reputation : 17817
Join date : 2015-07-31
- Post n°369
Re: 2016 NRL.com Fantasy Thread Part 9
charliemurphy wrote:Any got an opinion on D. Fifita? Was a gun in the 9's and surely should be able to oust Taga for that starting spot. Impact off the bench?
He is a PPM King that will never get the minutes you want him to.
You'll sit there marvelling at his 23 points in 16 minutes wondering what the point was.
morethanjustakeyboard- Posts : 41
Reputation : 12
Join date : 2016-03-01
- Post n°370
Re: 2016 NRL.com Fantasy Thread Part 9
charliemurphy wrote:
Peats is a gun. Sticky can't be trusted.
Consider the 66k an insurance policy.
really wish raiders played before parra!!!
Loomer- Fanatic
- Posts : 10738
Reputation : 4331
Join date : 2016-01-29
- Post n°371
Re: 2016 NRL.com Fantasy Thread Part 9
Milchcow wrote:
Price rises from the start.
I have toyed with the idea of starting Littlejohn. When he plays he scores big, if Moses/Brooks go down he'll get a start.
And if not, he'll be out of the team completely, so no money, but no bad AE and no leaking money.
Guys like Benry, Paasi, Green might make money for 1-2 weeks then get dumped to the bench and require immediate tradeout or you'll just lose the cash they made at the start as they start posting rubbish scores from 20 minute bench roles
Hmm excellent point. Bye bye Benry who I don't really want. Hello Littlejohn
Milchcow- Moderator
- Posts : 25395
Reputation : 17817
Join date : 2015-07-31
- Post n°372
Re: 2016 NRL.com Fantasy Thread Part 9
jstands wrote:Mateo should take a big money contract from the super league and fuck right off
He was actually pretty good to finish last year.
Averaged 26 points in the first half of the year. And 41 points in the 2nd half (as an 80 minute 2nd rower)
Now that he's back on the bench I'd stay away in fantasy, but I think he can be useful in actual NRL terms
Loomer- Fanatic
- Posts : 10738
Reputation : 4331
Join date : 2016-01-29
- Post n°373
Re: 2016 NRL.com Fantasy Thread Part 9
[quote="charliemurphy"]
Makes Rochow sound good but stats I have say in 2014 averaged 34pts playing 77 mins?
Makes Rochow sound good but stats I have say in 2014 averaged 34pts playing 77 mins?
Archer- Posts : 6604
Reputation : 2306
Join date : 2016-01-12
Location : Who's asking
- Post n°374
Re: 2016 NRL.com Fantasy Thread Part 9
Your Name wrote:Don't forget to put your ladder predictions in
https://www.nrlfantasyfanatics.com/t186-ladder-predictions
Didn't notice this thread, always fun. Done!
my tv broke- Fanatics Immortal
- Posts : 28415
Reputation : 21074
Join date : 2016-01-08
- Post n°375
Re: 2016 NRL.com Fantasy Thread Part 9
Would barrett have old ties to green feom the dragons? To me it seems like an odd pick for a new coach to throw him in to start but then pull him after one round. Barrett seems fairly straight up so im thinking green may hold the spot for a while
Milchcow- Moderator
- Posts : 25395
Reputation : 17817
Join date : 2015-07-31
- Post n°376
Re: 2016 NRL.com Fantasy Thread Part 9
Loomer wrote:
Averaged 41 in 2013.
Few years ago now but that's what people are basing their hope on.
Archer- Posts : 6604
Reputation : 2306
Join date : 2016-01-12
Location : Who's asking
- Post n°377
Re: 2016 NRL.com Fantasy Thread Part 9
Oh man, this talk of Littlejohn is not cool, now I'm second guessing my team >.< I still have memories of him tearing the Raiders to shreds and all the talk about Moses/Brooks being out of favour/courted by other teams (HAH!) during the pre season has me thinking.
Also I think Gutherson might be one of those wingers who has one 'OK' week followed by half a dozen weeks where he's not so Ok. Could swap them hmm
Also I think Gutherson might be one of those wingers who has one 'OK' week followed by half a dozen weeks where he's not so Ok. Could swap them hmm
Last edited by Archer on Tue Mar 01, 2016 11:50 pm; edited 1 time in total
charliemurphy- Posts : 279
Reputation : 29
Join date : 2016-02-04
- Post n°378
Re: 2016 NRL.com Fantasy Thread Part 9
Loomer wrote:
Averaged 43 for the first 10 rounds though
Pookus McFly- Posts : 5941
Reputation : 5585
Join date : 2016-01-18
- Post n°379
Re: 2016 NRL.com Fantasy Thread Part 9
Alright guys, one last unimportant pick to make and I am happy with my team!
I need a 130k NPR in the 2RF. Anybody got a rookie they have big wraps on?
I need a 130k NPR in the 2RF. Anybody got a rookie they have big wraps on?
StuDogg101- Posts : 4359
Reputation : 1854
Join date : 2015-09-30
Location : Christchurch, NZ
- Post n°380
Re: 2016 NRL.com Fantasy Thread Part 9
Best sub-$283k second rower aaaaand go
Also, anyone know anything about Nathan Davis at the Titans? Is he cover for MacDonald?
Also, anyone know anything about Nathan Davis at the Titans? Is he cover for MacDonald?