Lchy wrote:
Only gonna help his attacking scoring I reckon
Less likely to be roaming though given the other two do exactly that.
NRL Fantasy Fanatics - A place for discussion of NRL Fantasy / Virtual Sports / Super Coach and other Fantasy Sports
Lchy wrote:
Only gonna help his attacking scoring I reckon
my tv broke wrote:Ok so who has scored tries tonight and is now a must have?
my tv broke wrote:Ok so who has scored tries tonight and is now a must have?
my tv broke wrote:Ok so who has scored tries tonight and is now a must have?
Aardvark Ratnick wrote:
Tolutau Koula
rhinoceroo wrote:
All we know I'd that Siebold is a genius and it must have been the Broncos that were the problem.
Had Kelma since my first draft and don’t see why he doesn’t make that 10 points. Not really locked into any edges yet but he looks as good as any mid ranger to meWelshy wrote:Had Tuilagi and discussed on here with a few, There a fair amount of value on the Edge and ne needs to go around 45 to get his 10 points of value
Think at simialr price points I prefer Garner with Doorey/Loeiro
Krump wrote:
Had Kelma since my first draft and don’t see why he doesn’t make that 10 points. Not really locked into any edges yet but he looks as good as any mid ranger to me
rhinoceroo wrote:
All we know I'd that Siebold is a genius and it must have been the Broncos that were the problem.
Krump wrote:
Had Kelma since my first draft and don’t see why he doesn’t make that 10 points. Not really locked into any edges yet but he looks as good as any mid ranger to me
Welshy wrote:
Think he will mate, but I was choosing between Garner/Tuilagi then Garner I think less risk as he already has a legacy edge avergae of 48/49 and the other mentioned are 100k plus cheaper
mickspicks wrote:
Seibs like big min 2rf. With how the Manly squad looks it probably remains that way. Tuilagi looks fkn fit too.