SI wrote:Bromwich was my personal best on ground last night.
Haha.
So does that mean you are going to sell all your players OTHER than Bromwich so you can stack your team with one-game wonders?
NRL Fantasy Fanatics - A place for discussion of NRL Fantasy / Virtual Sports / Super Coach and other Fantasy Sports
SI wrote:Bromwich was my personal best on ground last night.
rjconner wrote:Oats is going to be one of the best WFB that you will properly get this year, If Bronco go big again this year and Oats stays where he is, looks promising. from what I saw Oats is one of there main runners of the ball for them, hes massive so most other wingmen will get eaten by him when he goes goes for the runs and trys, I believe he will be a must have in your back line at end of season.
He played 68minutes but nothing to worry about, he went sub 40 1st round last year and was a beast for the remainder. Minutes are there, points will followSimon Templar wrote:
+1
Good advice HS.
In VSDT I replaced Fensom (77) with J.Bromwich (49) BEFORE they layed and I had valid reasons.
IMO they are BOTH keepers once they are in your team, so I'm going to save my (valuable) trades and stick with J.Bromwich. My selection of Bromwich is based on his performances in previous seasons and NOT on ONE game, especially the first game of the season.
If Bromwich scored 46 in NRLF, that is NOTHING to worry about, especially if he only played 38 min.
lukeaye wrote:
These are literally the worst trades ive seen posted on these forums.
Do not touch J Brom unless he is out long term. A 70 - 80 minute prop are you Fu$%ing insane?!?!1111?!?
Oats wont score 66 every week and he isnt priced that cheaply.
chitmunkey wrote:is anyone considering Cody walker? Reynolds out for 6-16 weeks I heard on radio this morn.
made a few tackles only missed one and set up a few tries.
Bullbender wrote:
He played 68minutes but nothing to worry about, he went sub 40 1st round last year and was a beast for the remainder. Minutes are there, points will follow
chitmunkey wrote:is anyone considering Cody walker? Reynolds out for 6-16 weeks I heard on radio this morn.
made a few tackles only missed one and set up a few tries.
Neither. Id go Carter.jstands wrote:If you had neither would you go for Rochow or Whitehead?
chitmunkey wrote:is anyone considering Cody walker? Reynolds out for 6-16 weeks I heard on radio this morn.
made a few tackles only missed one and set up a few tries.
Warriors wrote:Thoughts on Ash Taylor guys? Good cow or dud? Would I be stupid to trade him to Garvey? Probably better to have a look first.
If you have JFH do you think he will get more than 18 minutes? Musgrove does look appealing.
If in doubt, don't trade. They will be far more valuable down the track I guess.
Bren wrote:Not trading in Carter this week, just one trade due to injury and giving others another 2 weeks. Also gives me time to see if Grevs gets more minutes also.
Bullbender wrote:
I agree with you here SG. There is underperforming and there is down right out of form, out of shape and possibly out of favour. The minutes from a senior player in a pack with a fair few debutants is very concerning and i can only see holding him ending in disaster. Along with his figure something has changed drastically from last year where he performed well. Depending how many guns you have in your front row i would be trading to a like priced keeper though unless you need t generate cash to upgrade an injury.
Shame really because he is a game winner. Can create something from nothing.Honeysett wrote:
I would assume Grevs is on the outer because he's signed with the Panthers next year. I don't think they will invest too many minutes into him.
Honeysett wrote:So my plan over the next 3 weeks is to get rid of the dud cows and make sure I get the right ones in otherwise only trade out injured players. Solid plan or should I be doing something different?