NRL Fantasy 2023 Part 8 - Hopgod!

mattnz wrote:

There is no question that Hynes is the best fullback in the team by a country mile. Trindall significantly outperforming a very average fullback in Kennedy is hardly a stretch.

Lchy wrote:

Hynes also won this relatively minor award called the Dally M medal at halfback, with the most votes ever polled. You don't think the Sharks will perform better if Trindall is at 7, you think your fantasy team will perform better

Rabbits21 wrote:Has anyone here got Cotter?

mattnz wrote:

He also increases risk of reinjury if doing lots of kicking. Everyone else thinks the odds are <1%, I don't.

Milchcow wrote:

I don't mind people questioning things, its how we'll get better fantasy teams. I've just spent a couple of posts talking about it too. Better to have robust discussion than just chuck in the popular players because that's what everyone else is doing.

But when people (and some people more than others) get things wrong it gets brought up again and again (and again) so frequently that it must put people off putting down the reasoning for their claims.

For example, if Jacob Preston plays less than 60 minutes this weekend, the over/under on the number of people who will feel the need to post about it would be about 9.5
Rabbits can't post his estimate for a players score or minutes without 3 or 4 replies adding decimal points to it. Sometimes that dead horse just doesn't need to be brought back for another flogging

robelgordo wrote:

I don’t want Milch getting mad at me, but I also don’t want members and lurkers looking for sound advice to lack guidance.

I’ll just say that in the Avengers, Dr Strange used the time stone to calculate there was one future reality out of 14.000,000ish where they defeat Thanos.

I think this scenario  is in a similar range

lukeayee wrote:

Never change Matt, your a god damn mad man.

Place would be stale without you.

Milchcow wrote:

I don't mind people questioning things, its how we'll get better fantasy teams. I've just spent a couple of posts talking about it too. Better to have robust discussion than just chuck in the popular players because that's what everyone else is doing.

But when people (and some people more than others) get things wrong it gets brought up again and again (and again) so frequently that it must put people off putting down the reasoning for their claims.

For example, if Jacob Preston plays less than 60 minutes this weekend, the over/under on the number of people who will feel the need to post about it would be about 9.5
Rabbits can't post his estimate for a players score or minutes without 3 or 4 replies adding decimal points to it. Sometimes that dead horse just doesn't need to be brought back for another flogging

robelgordo wrote:

Fair. the Talakai/Mulitalo stuff last year was like when Homer killed the Krusty Burglar

mattnz wrote:

At least I keep the discussion ticking over, and some alternative points of view for debate.

mattnz wrote:

There is no question that Hynes is the best fullback in the team by a country mile. Trindall significantly outperforming a very average fullback in Kennedy is hardly a stretch.

robelgordo wrote:

I don’t want Milch getting mad at me, but I also don’t want members and lurkers looking for sound advice to lack guidance.

I’ll just say that in the Avengers, Dr Strange used the time stone to calculate there was one future reality out of 14.000,000ish where they defeat Thanos.

I think this scenario  is in a similar range

So you're saying...:

Milchcow wrote:

I don't mind people questioning things, its how we'll get better fantasy teams. I've just spent a couple of posts talking about it too. Better to have robust discussion than just chuck in the popular players because that's what everyone else is doing.

But when people (and some people more than others) get things wrong it gets brought up again and again (and again) so frequently that it must put people off putting down the reasoning for their claims.

For example, if Jacob Preston plays less than 60 minutes this weekend, the over/under on the number of people who will feel the need to post about it would be about 9.5
Rabbits can't post his estimate for a players score or minutes without 3 or 4 replies adding decimal points to it. Sometimes that dead horse just doesn't need to be brought back for another flogging

Milchcow wrote:
Looking at TMM, trying to decide if he is worth it or not

Last year Daejern Asi averaged 34 playing as 6 next to Shaun Johnson. Chanel Harris-Tevita averaged 23

Which one is more like TMM?

mattnz wrote:

At least I keep the discussion ticking over, and some alternative points of view for debate.