I'd probably agree with him then personally. I CBF looking at every single positive and negative stat to determine base. If I look at negatives like ER, MT, PC then I have to look at TB, TO as well, it all becomes too much.Loomer wrote:
He was saying Bird average base at lock tackles+run metres and ignoring -12 per game in negatives
Of course I'd look at them if I'm trying to do a bird projection, but if I'm just looking at birds "base", I too am just looking at tackles and run m (to get a vibe)