easytiger wrote:
I don't understand the "mockingbockingwill" reference?
Anyway, Daily Telegraph reporting that Mark Nawaqanitawase is on a $900k over 2 year contract.
I've probably said this before, so at the risk of being a broken record;
I don't think the Roosters are cheating the cap.
I do think the Roosters are possibly the greatest exponent of providing players benefits outside of the cap that relates to setting them up for life after footy - be it education/mentorship, business and financial nous and those other intangibles that are probably in no way a breach of the cap rules, but offer meaningful benefits to the players.
It seems to me that the players maybe earn less in the short term than they would at an inferior club (looking at your Wests Tigers etc) but that they are assisted to make better financial decisions that in the long term set them up for their family and life after football, plus they get to play with a quality club that has their shit together and usually plays finals football.
The club benefits, but the players win too - is that the club or players fault?
Is it the Roosters fault that other organisations are not as holistically well-managed?
It's probably more on the troubled clubs to raise their game.
The Roosters aren't alone in this department and clubs like the Storm, Panthers, Broncos understand their strengths and are able to operate in a manner that maximises every aspect across the organisation and this has resulted in sustained success.
In terms of JWH - he's 34 years old.
It's pretty standard for a player in their twilight to get paid a lot less than in their peak. I'm pretty sure Benji Marshall (who once commanded close to a mil) was sub $200k in his last year at Souths for example.
I was going to say I'm not sure Rabs was actually agreeing with what I said
I feel this is more aligned to my views on it all.