All. Of. This. The all knowing, all seeing cow always articulates what I'm thinking better than I can.Milchcow wrote:
I also think the idea of only keeping half of your profits is a good one.
I prefer it when the game is more about picking the best scoring players, and not an economic management game that just happens to include NRL games.
Have always wondered what it would be like to have a comp where you pick one squad and then make no further trades (except maybe via player swap to other teams) because it better mirrors the actual roster management of a coach.
I understand why they wouldn't because they want those engagement dollars that come from constant changes (that would be lacking if you had a fit and healthy 17 scoring well each week), but any rules that can bring it closer to that talent scout/roster management aspect rather than economic management I'm all for.