GreenSchist wrote:
Ditch Grant and go Boyd (cover HOK/HLF).
Use the extra $150k to strengthen your 16-17
No one else I really want in that range if I do have the cash. Potentially only Flanno
NRL Fantasy Fanatics - A place for discussion of NRL Fantasy / Virtual Sports / Super Coach and other Fantasy Sports
GreenSchist wrote:
Ditch Grant and go Boyd (cover HOK/HLF).
Use the extra $150k to strengthen your 16-17
The Pascoe Fiasco wrote:
I’m risking Galvin. We are currently in 9th, but I think we have peaked a tad early. He was by far best on field in that trial and even if not selected for Rd 2, after a few hidings he’ll be starting before long. Galvin is only 18 so I very much doubt he starts at 6, although Canberra is probably the team to do it I suppose. Benji loves him too! I think Galvin plays 14 as Koro should play 80 to start the season.
GreenSchist wrote:
Are we even certain the bulk of the kicking is going to Fog now that Strange is his partner?
Strange was the more dominant kicker in the trials so would have to think he's at least a capable kick option going forward. Could steal two or three points away from Fogs.
Edit: I'm currently tossing up ta similar issue and more times than not, I end up with Boyd in my team instead of Fog. In your case, I'd be happy just going Hutch and using the $200k elsewhere.
Liverpool_Bulldog wrote:Kinda torn between Fog and Hutch to partner Cleary. The 200k+ could be quite useful
Think the bulk of the KMs going to Fog probably makes him a safer pick?
Snatchpato wrote:Probably been posted a million times but what are Smithies base stats?
Tackles, meters, tbs, offloads? And in what minutes?
Probably will just go lolo myself and evaluate later. Not like he’s going to become a top tier gun anyway, and he’s not cheap enough to worry about missing probably.
Jele wrote:
Nothing is certain but Strange averaged 29 kick metres in 11 games at five-eighth in NSW Cup last year. So it might have been more that Weekes is a poor kicker than Strange a good one.
Shady2K wrote:No one on McInnes despite starting at 13? Don’t think he’ll still command 55-60 minutes? Could be cheaper alternative to Hopgood
Shady2K wrote:No one on McInnes despite starting at 13? Don’t think he’ll still command 55-60 minutes? Could be cheaper alternative to Hopgood
Milchcow wrote:
Do it if you want, but if you look at his stats with and without Finucane in the team, there's a big drop off for McInnes with Finucane plays.
Shady2K wrote:Milchcow wrote:
Do it if you want, but if you look at his stats with and without Finucane in the team, there's a big drop off for McInnes with Finucane plays.
Guess it would be a gamble he gets a bigger role as C and is more important to the team on the field
Milchcow wrote:
Have you looked at who his co-captain is?
Camo123 wrote:
My earlier thoughts
Not really sure on McInnes. At lock with Finucane in last 2 years he’s 53 in 56 mins which is basically at price with early bye.
He also had a major major major outlier of 81 tackles last year which if you exclude that he’s around 56 which is mainly without Finucane and some games without Rudolf
Shady2K wrote:No one on McInnes despite starting at 13? Don’t think he’ll still command 55-60 minutes? Could be cheaper alternative to Hopgood