Milchcow wrote:
Its true about taking a risk. And I'm glad I got Koro and Galvin in before they'd played a game for that reason
But we don't have unlimited trades, there's only 2 we can make this week and if we bring Blaize in that means that Fine or Dylan Brown or someone isn't coming in instead.
Finefeuiaki has a similar BE and job security, but arguable better point scoring capability
Blaize is playing an unknown position, and we're just guessing/hoping what he'll score at. He's certainly tempting though - and if someone had the balls to ditch Cleary for Blaize + another cheapie then it could potentially set up their cash flow for weeks to come.
Definitely hear you and others on trades being limited. But that’s kinda the reason I think it’s so important. Especially at this point of the season to prioritise your cows.
Sometimes you’ll be unlucky and the cow won’t fit the positional cover needs. I need two WFBs this week as I lost 3 of the 4 I owned (Walsh, Tuaupiki, Papy). I’m still considering Blaize and playing with 16.
I think it’s really important to remember you need about $13m to build a final 17. and yes there’s a balance of points vs cash generated but you only get two trades a week.
The more certainty you want the more trades you have to spend generating that cash.
I’m certainly not trying to imply Blaize is a must have. It’s pretty rare to have someone like Galvin who has high fantasy upside and reasonable long term job security. Just consider the two:
Luki is due back in 5 weeks.
Moses is due back in 8.
To get 150k:
Fine needs to get close to 40 point average. That’s maybe 5 points less than I expect from Nanai.
Blaize needs a 29 point average. That’s 3 points more than Kane Elgey.
Certainty on role and pedigree costs flexibility (are you committing one of your two trades), cash gen (upside) and roster churn (need to spend trades quicker as they have less time in viable fantasy roles).
I know people are struggling to field a full squad this week or have mountains of cash from selling Haas and Cleary so I’m not saying swing at every cow but this isn’t SuperCoach with delayed price changes.
It's more about realising when cows have asymmetric risk profiles.Team balance in Not having too many low upside cows on the bench and future flexibility(most people will have a lot of mid rangers to upgrade in a few weeks (Smithies, Rapana, Burbo, Strange, Sitilli, Wong, Piakura, Kris, Flanagan, Hutchinson, Levi, Hughes, Chan etc.) so picking cows just one week earlier means making more money and having better future flexibility.
It can also bring a dud cow that adds to that huge list so it’s not foolproof but the key point I’ve rambled for too long on is certainty has a cost. Just be more willing to consider cows a week earlier as you may realise it’s less risky and your range of outcomes is better and future weeks can be easier even if this week is objectively worse.