SI wrote:
Nah, I think it's that other Dogs supporter WL that has Macca.
Correct.
NRL Fantasy Fanatics - A place for discussion of NRL Fantasy / Virtual Sports / Super Coach and other Fantasy Sports
SI wrote:
Nah, I think it's that other Dogs supporter WL that has Macca.
SI wrote:
Nah, I think it's that other Dogs supporter WL that has Macca.
SI wrote:
Nah, I think it's that other Dogs supporter WL that has Macca.
Rippin and Tearin wrote:
Who's your other Hooker again mate? You have Macca right? I was initially thinking Macca to Kodi but reckon Kodi isn't really gonna generate much cash so probably not worth the trade(s) in that respect, and I'm not confident his scoring will be high enough to warrant having him in the 17, particularly if he is gonna continue to come off the bench still. Do you gain much from trading him in?
I've ended up going Macca to Hodgson, funded by a downgrade of Carter to Asiata (in hope of Bye round points).
SI wrote:
Nah, I think it's that other Dogs supporter WL that has Macca.
SI wrote:
Nah, I think it's that other Dogs supporter WL that has Macca.
Rippin and Tearin wrote:
Who's your other Hooker again mate? You have Macca right? I was initially thinking Macca to Kodi but reckon Kodi isn't really gonna generate much cash so probably not worth the trade(s) in that respect, and I'm not confident his scoring will be high enough to warrant having him in the 17, particularly if he is gonna continue to come off the bench still. Do you gain much from trading him in?
I've ended up going Macca to Hodgson, funded by a downgrade of Carter to Asiata (in hope of Bye round points).
White Lightning wrote:
Correct.
jstands wrote:
That's WL, I have Smith and Parcell. The only reason for the trades is to cash out and hopefully earn some more cash from the two replacements.
The trades leave a hefty amount of money to upgrade the likes of Parcell and Hastings
Bren wrote:Jesus how many times is WL going to reply to the same post
Rippin and Tearin wrote:
Why not go with the replacement Knights halve, better cash out option and may well generate more cash too.
White Lightning wrote:
Correct.
SI wrote:
Considering he was one of the best averaging Centres in 2014 (?) from memory. Was determined to start him this year but when Hunt was preferred over him 30 minutes before 1st Souths game I did swapsies.
jstands wrote:
Well realistically we still have no idea who will start in the halves, and whoever gets the gig could just as easily get dropped in a week or two to try out a different combo
SI wrote:Like really shit.