HomeJust heard on 7 News that Adam Reynolds will be the likely Blues 7 and they'll go without Pearce. Would I be crazy for wanting to get Mitchell Pearce into my team? Dominant kicker, scored a 50 in the last game with little attacking stats and he's got good bye coverage.
2016 NRL.com Fantasy Thread Part 32
Poll
Should there be more page 51 parties
- [ 14 ]
[52%]
- [ 5 ]
- [19%]
- [ 8 ]
- [29%]
Total Votes: 27
Poll closed
Poll closed
Johnny B Goode- Posts : 4077
Reputation : 711
Join date : 2016-01-30
EvenSteeden- Posts : 365
Reputation : 43
Join date : 2015-10-30
Location : NZ
Anyone bringing in the Semitrailer this week?
Playing the Storm this week but then Knights in round 12
Playing the Storm this week but then Knights in round 12
Honeysett- Moderator
- Posts : 8949
Reputation : 6471
Join date : 2015-09-28
EvenSteeden wrote:Anyone bringing in the Semitrailer this week?
Playing the Storm this week but then Knights in round 12
This guy right here.
Guest- Guest
Not bringing in Mannering this week. Was going to but he doesn't play next week and he may have smaller minutes because of coming back from injury. I'll just wait and bring in ET for Blaw next week
bluetige- Posts : 2235
Reputation : 749
Join date : 2015-12-13
@ Boozecluz. Sirro's not injured, he has finally been dropped
EvenSteeden- Posts : 365
Reputation : 43
Join date : 2015-10-30
Location : NZ
Honeysett wrote:
This guy right here.
Hmmm...might be joining you on the trailer...that way don't have to play Gutherson too
Guest- Guest
How the hell does Tedesco and Mullen have the same amount of Dally M points?
Johnny B Goode- Posts : 4077
Reputation : 711
Join date : 2016-01-30
I won't be bringing in Semi. I know he's probably headed for a 4 try haul against the Knights but way too boom or bust for my liking. Also he doesn't play the round after 2 of the byes so if you've got thin depth in the WFB/CTR's like me you might not be able to field 17 players in those rounds if you've got lots of Eels and/or Dragons/Roosters backs.
Honeysett- Moderator
- Posts : 8949
Reputation : 6471
Join date : 2015-09-28
EvenSteeden wrote:
Hmmm...might be joining you on the trailer...that way don't have to play Gutherson too
I traded that gangly looking fuck away.
Guest- Guest
bluetige wrote:@ Boozecluz. Sirro's not injured, he has finally been dropped
Mulvy- Moderator
- Posts : 22374
Reputation : 13731
Join date : 2016-01-26
Location : Mulvania
I've literally changed my trades about 100 times so far. Thinking:
Barba -> Aitken
Aubbs -> Mooper
Gives me
Smith Parcell
Graham JBrom Blaw Herman
Surgess Jturbo whitehead Cartwright Mooper Fensom
Hunt Norman Hastings Lamb
Holland Claw auva'a Benry
Munster Aitken Mitchell Guth Feeney
17 trades left 172k
4 red dots but hopefully Fensom and Herman play round 12. Next week, assuming Asiata (or someone better) gets named he cashes out Blaw via Surgess. Should leave a chunk of cash to bring in Friend or Harris or hopefully both over the next few weeks. Fensom might become Mannering.
Would someone pick apart my plan please?
Barba -> Aitken
Aubbs -> Mooper
Gives me
Smith Parcell
Graham JBrom Blaw Herman
Surgess Jturbo whitehead Cartwright Mooper Fensom
Hunt Norman Hastings Lamb
Holland Claw auva'a Benry
Munster Aitken Mitchell Guth Feeney
17 trades left 172k
4 red dots but hopefully Fensom and Herman play round 12. Next week, assuming Asiata (or someone better) gets named he cashes out Blaw via Surgess. Should leave a chunk of cash to bring in Friend or Harris or hopefully both over the next few weeks. Fensom might become Mannering.
Would someone pick apart my plan please?
Guest- Guest
Trading out Barba? Surely he is a WFB keeper?
Guest- Guest
Bren wrote:Trading out Barba? Surely he is a WFB keeper?
Depends who you have back there. He relies massively on attacking points as his involvement is minimal.
I am a massive sharks fan and I have traded him this week for the above reason, plus his byes.
If it was a choice between him and Mitchell, I would go Mitchell as he has a habit of doing the old 'Inglis' crab and his fend racks up points.
Bit of a flip of the coin really and really depends on you approach to things. Same reason people choose a Milford over BHunt for example
Munster is locked in the back for me,Aitken is there now for a while until Tedesco gets back so unfortunately Barba misses out.
Revraiser- Fanatic
- Posts : 17155
Reputation : 9482
Join date : 2015-10-21
Location : Sydney
Johnny B Goode wrote:Just heard on 7 News that Adam Reynolds will be the likely Blues 7 and they'll go without Pearce. Would I be crazy for wanting to get Mitchell Pearce into my team? Dominant kicker, scored a 50 in the last game with little attacking stats and he's got good bye coverage.
Pearce is always in the no go zone fantasy wise. Big call mate.
Someone tell me it is ok to trade out Latrell !
rhinoceroo- Fanatic
- Posts : 14020
Reputation : 9265
Join date : 2015-09-30
Revraiser wrote:
Pearce is always in the no go zone fantasy wise. Big call mate.
Someone tell me it is ok to trade out Latrell !
Wouldn't be trading out Latrell unless I had Munster, Dugan and a fit Tedesco back there, and even then I'd be keeping him for the byes.
Last edited by rhinoceroo on Wed May 18, 2016 8:24 pm; edited 1 time in total
Mulvy- Moderator
- Posts : 22374
Reputation : 13731
Join date : 2016-01-26
Location : Mulvania
Boozecluez wrote:
Depends who you have back there. He relies massively on attacking points as his involvement is minimal.
I am a massive sharks fan and I have traded him this week for the above reason, plus his byes.
If it was a choice between him and Mitchell, I would go Mitchell as he has a habit of doing the old 'Inglis' crab and his fend racks up points.
Bit of a flip of the coin really and really depends on you approach to things. Same reason people choose a Milford over BHunt for example
Munster is locked in the back for me,Aitken is there now for a while until Tedesco gets back so unfortunately Barba misses out.
Verbatim my reason for the trade especially the last sentence. Aitken either goes for Ted eventually or gets moved to centres or stays if something happens to Ted. Or if the latter happens Barba could even come back in after the byes as I agree he could certainly be a keeper.
Chucky- Posts : 3180
Reputation : 3402
Join date : 2015-10-01
Age : 55
Location : Port Stephens
Have you found a loophole that gives you unlimited trades?mulvy wrote:
Verbatim my reason for the trade especially the last sentence. Aitken either goes for Ted eventually or gets moved to centres or stays if something happens to Ted. Or if the latter happens Barba could even come back in after the byes as I agree he could certainly be a keeper.
Please share.
Archer- Posts : 6604
Reputation : 2306
Join date : 2016-01-12
Location : Who's asking
Hmm, more bye planning and Rd 15 really looks like the tricky one for my team.
Whenever I look at players who I could accept as keepers that will shore up my team over the byes, they fit in Rd 12 & Rd 18.... bugger. I guess it means I should look at Roosters players but they all kinda seem only just below what I envision in my final 17...
Whenever I look at players who I could accept as keepers that will shore up my team over the byes, they fit in Rd 12 & Rd 18.... bugger. I guess it means I should look at Roosters players but they all kinda seem only just below what I envision in my final 17...
Last edited by Archer on Wed May 18, 2016 9:11 pm; edited 1 time in total
OnTheLast- Posts : 870
Reputation : 203
Join date : 2016-03-08
Preloading before I go to the page 51 party.
Guest- Guest
ShhhOnTheLast wrote:
Preloading before I go to the page 51 party.
