NRL Fantasy Fanatics - A place for discussion of NRL Fantasy / Virtual Sports / Super Coach and other Fantasy Sports
[52%] [19%] [29%] 
mulvy wrote:
Verbatim my reason for the trade especially the last sentence. Aitken either goes for Ted eventually or gets moved to centres or stays if something happens to Ted. Or if the latter happens Barba could even come back in after the byes as I agree he could certainly be a keeper.
difO wrote:carrying tapau and teddy hurts
wolfking wrote:
No offense, but that's got to be one of the craziest things I've read on here.
Chucky wrote:
Have you found a loophole that gives you unlimited trades?
Please share.
mulvy wrote:
No offence taken. So the Barba trade is bad, or just the part about getting him back in?
Bothmulvy wrote:
No offence taken. So the Barba trade is bad, or just the part about getting him back in?
18 at present, but certainly not enough to be wasting them like that.mulvy wrote:
How many should I have left? How many do you have left?
wolfking wrote:
I think the reason to trade him now due to the fact most of his points are from big attacking stats and his made a shit ton of money is completely fine. But to trade him back in at a premium price seems like madness to me. Wasting 2 trades on a cow that you started the year with and has become a keeper.
mulvy wrote:I've literally changed my trades about 100 times so far. Thinking:
Barba -> Aitken
Aubbs -> Mooper
Gives me
Smith Parcell
Graham JBrom Blaw Herman
Surgess Jturbo whitehead Cartwright Mooper Fensom
Hunt Norman Hastings Lamb
Holland Claw auva'a Benry
Munster Aitken Mitchell Guth Feeney
17 trades left 172k
4 red dots but hopefully Fensom and Herman play round 12. Next week, assuming Asiata (or someone better) gets named he cashes out Blaw via Surgess. Should leave a chunk of cash to bring in Friend or Harris or hopefully both over the next few weeks. Fensom might become Mannering.
Would someone pick apart my plan please?
mulvy wrote:wolfking wrote:
I think the reason to trade him now due to the fact most of his points are from big attacking stats and his made a shit ton of money is completely fine. But to trade him back in at a premium price seems like madness to me. Wasting 2 trades on a cow that you started the year with and has become a keeper.
I don't disagree. Like I said the plan is to probably have Ted, Munster, Mitchell as my three with Aitken during the byes. Barba would only be entertained later if shit happens and I have trades left. I was kinda just saying that I agree that he's a potential keeper, and some will keep him, but for me I'll probs keep Mitchell. Make sense?
Bren wrote:Getting closer now
Home
