2016 NRL.com Fantasy thread part 35

White Lightning wrote:

I would loophole ET's score. Remember to put Radradra in your npr's.

OK, so just a straight swap, Gutherson (who was a R) to Radradra? I end up have Radradra on my bench with the C still on him and no option to click or unclick R on him. Does that all sound like it should be to get ET as my C?

Did anyone else have the VC on ET? and are you using the loophole as well? 69 seems like its definitely worth doing.

Hayne has always said there's only one club he'd want to play for & that's the Eels. He's a 1 club man & money is not an issue with him. I feel if the Roosters offered him twice what the Eels would he'd still stay with the Eels. Sounds like the Eels are clearing the path.

White Lightning wrote:Hayne has always said there's only one club he'd want to play for & that's the Eels. He's a 1 club man & money is not an issue with him. I feel if the Roosters offered him twice what the Eels would he'd still stay with the Eels. Sounds like the Eels are clearing the path.

Surely its gotta come into consideration though?? The money I mean, why else would he be considering a Union contract in France or Japan? $ is the only reason people take contracts there......

Rippin and Tearin wrote:

OK, so just a straight swap, Gutherson (who was a R) to Radradra? I end up have Radradra on my bench with the C still on him and no option to click or unclick R on him. Does that all sound like it should be to get ET as my C?

Did anyone else have the VC on ET? and are you using the loophole as well? 69 seems like its definitely worth doing.

You have to take the R off Radradra & put the R on someone who isn't playing. So this will put Radradra in your npr's. Then you will get Radradra's score as an a.e.

Bren wrote:69er for the win.

Maybe its a sign and more good things are gonna cum to me tonight as well

Rippin and Tearin wrote:

Surely its gotta come into consideration though?? The money I mean, why else would he be considering a Union contract in France or Japan? $ is the only reason people take contracts there......

That's rugby though & he has no loyalty to any club so he'd go for the money for sure. But when it comes to league & the Eels it's very different as he's extremely loyal to the Eels. In reality he's already a millionaire so money is not an issue.

White Lightning wrote:

That's rugby though & he has no loyalty to any club so he'd go for the money for sure. But when it comes to league & the Eels it's very different as he's extremely loyal to the Eels. In reality he's already a millionaire so money is not an issue.

Fair enough, so you think he will sign before June 30 aye??

My nrl fantasy page still won't load. Starting to piss me off haha. Must stay patient.

Rippin and Tearin wrote:

Surely its gotta come into consideration though?? The money I mean, why else would he be considering a Union contract in France or Japan? $ is the only reason people take contracts there......

Well playing Union would also be about getting his body back into some sort of league fitness before next season starts.

Broncos v Tigers changes:

Lets talk final teams

Best CTR/WFB on averages are

Leilua Croker
Tedesco Munster Rapana

I don't think that's an ideal final 17, wouldn't want 3 Raiders in there for a start. So what sort of makeup are people aiming for.

Aitken Holland
Tedesco Mansour Mitchell
(Also have Barba and will probably keep as 18th man and cover for hlf/wfb)

Holland will go sooner or later for someone.
I will upgrade one of Mansour Mitchell to Munster

What should I do with the last spot? Keep Mitchell/Mansour and hope they improve? Its not like they are scoring terribly so I'd save a trade.

Rippin and Tearin wrote:

Fair enough, so you think he will sign before June 30 aye??

I'm not sure. I saw a little bit of him playing in the sevens & he looked a little bit out of condition. Also he's been playing nfl which is more strength & explosive based so aerobically he'd need a good couple of months intensive fitness to get back to the fitness levels for league. Even more so for fullback which requires even more aerobic capabilty.

Milford had a b/e of 72 & scored 38. Was @ 439k so he's going to tumble in price & have an even higher b/e next week. His price could really be in free fall now. Mind you he really looks out of form with a loss of confidence so I won't go near him. With Milford though all it takes is one boom game & he'll regain that confidence & start carving up so hopefully he'll be 100k cheaper when that happens.

Milchcow wrote:Lets talk final teams

Best CTR/WFB on averages are

Leilua Croker
Tedesco Munster Rapana

I don't think that's an ideal final 17, wouldn't want 3 Raiders in there for a start. So what sort of makeup are people aiming for.

Aitken Holland
Tedesco Mansour Mitchell
(Also have Barba and will probably keep as 18th man and cover for hlf/wfb)

Holland will go sooner or later for someone.
I will upgrade one of Mansour Mitchell to Munster

What should I do with the last spot? Keep Mitchell/Mansour and hope they improve? Its not like they are scoring terribly so I'd save a trade.

Personally at this stage I have:

CLaw, Aitken, Holland, Gutho
Barba, Munster, Tedesco, Mitchell & Bye Round 130ker....

My Aim is

Aitken, BJ/Croker
Munster, Tedesco, Barba or Mitchell. (Maybe Rapana, but is it worth the trade?)

I think Mitchell will improve as the Roosters improve. The Panthers have been hit and miss, and so has Mansour.

So is BHunts 59 enough to chuck him in the loophole?

Sik wrote:So is BHunts 59 enough to chuck him in the loophole?

It says above he got 57. I also had the vc on him (J. Graham c) & for me he had to get 60+ for me to consider the loophole.

Sik wrote:So is BHunts 59 enough to chuck him in the loophole?

I'm showing 57 for him...I think I'll loophole that one even so - just in case Graham has an off night/injury
I think I'd rather miss out on the 10 or so points if Graham gets mid 60's compared to the large drop in case he gets injured

Rippin and Tearin wrote:

OK, so just a straight swap, Gutherson (who was a R) to Radradra? I end up have Radradra on my bench with the C still on him and no option to click or unclick R on him. Does that all sound like it should be to get ET as my C?

Did anyone else have the VC on ET? and are you using the loophole as well? 69 seems like its definitely worth doing.

I had the V on ET

Im stoked, that's like a Cam Smith score haha 138 points. I need it too cause I lost 700 spots last night

Think I did this loophole thing right..

Had the VC on ET, C on Graham.

Swapped JBrom in for Graham. Have 4 reserves on the bench selected, Graham isn't one of them. Means I should get Grahams score for JBrom.

Sorry, my mistake... 57