Finch wrote:Think I did this loophole thing right..
Had the VC on ET, C on Graham.
Swapped JBrom in for Graham. Have 4 reserves on the bench selected, Graham isn't one of them. Means I should get Grahams score for JBrom.
Correct.
NRL Fantasy Fanatics - A place for discussion of NRL Fantasy / Virtual Sports / Super Coach and other Fantasy Sports
Finch wrote:Think I did this loophole thing right..
Had the VC on ET, C on Graham.
Swapped JBrom in for Graham. Have 4 reserves on the bench selected, Graham isn't one of them. Means I should get Grahams score for JBrom.
Finch wrote:Think I did this loophole thing right..
Had the VC on ET, C on Graham.
Swapped JBrom in for Graham. Have 4 reserves on the bench selected, Graham isn't one of them. Means I should get Grahams score for JBrom.
Rippin and Tearin wrote:
Haha, Im still confused. I got ET as VC and C on Radradra, so do I swap Radradra for Gutherson (Green Dot), or for example Mitchell (Blue Dot).
Rippin and Tearin wrote:
Haha, Im still confused. I got ET as VC and C on Radradra, so do I swap Radradra for Gutherson (Green Dot), or for example Mitchell (Blue Dot).
Milchcow wrote:Lets talk final teams
Best CTR/WFB on averages are
Leilua Croker
Tedesco Munster Rapana
I don't think that's an ideal final 17, wouldn't want 3 Raiders in there for a start. So what sort of makeup are people aiming for.
Aitken Holland
Tedesco Mansour Mitchell
(Also have Barba and will probably keep as 18th man and cover for hlf/wfb)
Holland will go sooner or later for someone.
I will upgrade one of Mansour Mitchell to Munster
What should I do with the last spot? Keep Mitchell/Mansour and hope they improve? Its not like they are scoring terribly so I'd save a trade.
Bren wrote:
I said the Broncos were missing more experience and twice as many players as the Tigers. Fact.
So you make out that the tigers should have won and then cite odds to have a go at the knights? Did you happen to look at the odds on last nights game at all?Bren wrote:
Even the betting odds are laughing at the Knights. $IOOI
Like comparing chalk and cheese. Nice try.Krump wrote:
So you make out that the tigers should have won and then cite odds to have a go at the knights? Did you happen to look at the odds on last nights game at all?