2016 NRL.com Fantasy Thread Part 37

White Lightning wrote:

Parker's score of 26 is pretty bad considering the Warriors had a lot of ball so the Broncos had to do a lot of defense. Origin must have really taken a lot out of him.

Yeah. Defo my last week with Parker.

So proud of the Warriors effort. Even if the Broncos were full strength the Warriors still would of won imo. The whole pack did their job & dominated which allowed the backs front foot ball. The test now is can the Warriors turn up with the same positive attitude next week.

filthridden wrote:


I miss the bears. They were my uncle's team - he was probably going to the same games you were living in North Sydney around that same time, maybe a few years before.

I grew up supporting the Bears - probably would say I follow the Broncos nominally now purely on them being the closest team, but like Monty I just enjoy the game whoever's playing (except Manly - they can go get fucked)

White Lightning wrote:So proud of the Warriors effort. Even if the Broncos were full strength the Warriors still would of won imo. The whole pack did their job & dominated which allowed the backs front foot ball. The test now is can the Warriors turn up with the same positive attitude next week.

Theyre only playing Newcastle... So if they can play the first half like they did yesterday against the Broncos, theyll BLOW them off the park.

B/L wrote:Are you the same monty who runs fanfooty ?

Wing Wing Wing, Herro?

Herro! Would you wike to order some fwy wice?

B/L wrote:Are you the same monty who runs fanfooty ?

Yep.

m0nty (FanLeague) wrote:

Yep.

I just thought you might be a Souths fan with the scoreline in your avatar Sticking it to all Broncos fans on the downlow.

White Lightning wrote:So proud of the Warriors effort. Even if the Broncos were full strength the Warriors still would of won imo. The whole pack did their job & dominated which allowed the backs front foot ball. The test now is can the Warriors turn up with the same positive attitude next week.

Its shaping up to be the same as every other Warriors season - start the season like a absolute car-crash, jagging just enough wins against shit teams to keep them afloat, they get the Broncos at home during origin and put in their best performance of the season, then they put some shit teams to the sword for the rest of the origin period, the media starts talking them up as smokeys for the premiership just in time for them to fall off a cliff and finish 9th-10th

I read on sc addicts that the weather today in Sydney is pretty bad. Hopefully ET (c) will pull off 50 tackles & score 60+.

surmo13 wrote:

Its shaping up to be the same as every other Warriors season - start the season like a absolute car-crash, jagging just enough wins against shit teams to keep them afloat, they get the Broncos at home during origin and put in their best performance of the season, then they put some shit teams to the sword for the rest of the origin period, the media starts talking them up as smokeys for the premiership just in time for them to fall off a cliff and finish 9th-10th

Nailed it!

Bren wrote:
I just thought you might be a Souths fan with the scoreline in your avatar Sticking it to all Broncos fans on the downlow.

Nah that was just the first game of R1.

I didn't get to watch the Warriors game. I saw some highlights and obviously some of the backs really performed (loved the Kata try). But for those that watched it, who in the forwards stepped up to finally give the backs some front foot ball to work with??

White Lightning wrote:I read on sc addicts that the weather today in Sydney is pretty bad. Hopefully ET (c) will pull off 50 tackles & score 60+.

You don't need to go to addicts to see that.

Current Sydney rain radar

Rippin and Tearin wrote:I didn't get to watch the Warriors game. I saw some highlights and obviously some of the backs really performed (loved the Kata try). But for those that watched it, who in the forwards stepped up to finally give the backs some front foot ball to work with??

All if them really. Lillyman + Luke had good games. Mannering too.

Finch wrote:

All if them really. Lillyman + Luke had good games. Mannering too.

Cool thanks mate. Lillyman has been on the improve for a few weeks I reckon - he just needs more help.

I always wondered that when Luke could get back to form and fitness whether he could make a big difference. Mannering is always solid aye.

The stats suggest Matulino played well and Vete too. How'd u reckon the younger fullahs went. The Warriors need those kids to come on and make an impact. Keep that go forward going. Gubb's RM look low...Vete looks good, and Lisone OK.

Matty Bowen playing for Townsville Blackhawks again this weekend.

Probably stupid question but loophole VC score and AE get added after all games finished/lockout over yes?

Rippin and Tearin wrote:

Cool thanks mate. Lillyman has been on the improve for a few weeks I reckon - he just needs more help.

I always wondered that when Luke could get back to form and fitness whether he could make a big difference. Mannering is always solid aye.

The stats suggest Matulino played well and Vete too. How'd u reckon the younger fullahs went. The Warriors need those kids to come on and make an impact. Keep that go forward going. Gubb's RM look low...Vete looks good, and Lisone OK.

Losing was making some strong hits in D and some runs when we needed it. Honestly, there really wasn't a bad forward at all lol. Player we didn't really see much if was Manu, Kata doesn' like to pass the ball. But even Manu was making his customary big runs to start the set.

Loomer wrote:Probably stupid question but loophole VC score and AE get added after all games finished/lockout over yes?

Yeah I think thats how it works. I've done the swap now for example, Surgess (c) subbed out for Ma'u, with J-Brom (vc) in the 17. Score hasn't changed.