NRL Fantasy Fanatics - A place for discussion of NRL Fantasy / Virtual Sports / Super Coach and other Fantasy Sports
Johnny B Goode wrote:
lol he's their problem now. Wonder if they actually saw him play or they just wanted to add another guy with the name Burgess to their team
Finch wrote:Lets go Parcell and James (C)
I am more than happy if James wants to pull out another 100 point game.
This game smells of golden point imo.
bluetige wrote:Johnny B Goode wrote:
lol he's their problem now. Wonder if they actually saw him play or they just wanted to add another guy with the name Burgess to their team
I reckon they should bring back Luke before June 30 and also try and get Michael Burgess from Tweed Heads
I'd keep Parcell if Watson keeps appearing on the bench, Friend over Parcell if e starts playing 80 againOnTheLast wrote:Parcell, Capt James, Jtrbo going nicely. As of late I'm wondering if it's even worth upgrading Parcell to Friend, they both seem to be scoring on a similar level.
m0nty (FanLeague) wrote:My decision to trade in Napa instead of James a few weeks ago just because of bye coverage is looming as my worst fantasy decision ever.
I'm not just talking from a fantasy perspective. It also takes a lot of impetus out of the comp in general.White Lightning wrote:
That's tough mate. I had 11 & lost Munster as well. I agree that the bye rounds are a pain in the ass but they do provide opportunity for those behind to catch up. If there were no bye rounds the fantasy comp would be over half way through the season unless you were right up there & people would give up.
Home