Bren wrote:
I'm holding ET this week, if he scores less then 50 and Barnett scores more then 60 then I'll make the switch next week.
yep that's how I'm seeing it
NRL Fantasy Fanatics - A place for discussion of NRL Fantasy / Virtual Sports / Super Coach and other Fantasy Sports
Bren wrote:
I'm holding ET this week, if he scores less then 50 and Barnett scores more then 60 then I'll make the switch next week.
Bren wrote:Milchcow wrote:
Yes, we make mistakes, and if we don't correct them, they become errors.
~ Bryce Cartwright
would consider not one of them to be errors matemulvy wrote:
My "Errors": ET, Kbrom, elgey, idris, hayne. Surely they're holds right?
They are not errors all of the are making money,albeit slowly.mulvy wrote:
My "Errors": ET, Kbrom, elgey, idris, hayne. Surely they're holds right? edit not counting pyton as a mistake
Sashamaloo wrote:
They are not errors all of the are making money,albeit slowly.
I would classify an error as picking a cash loser.
They are judgement choices where maybe another player you considered at that price has done better.
my tv broke wrote:Burns seems like an 18 pt avg to me
mulvy wrote:Sashamaloo wrote:
They are not errors all of the are making money,albeit slowly.
I would classify an error as picking a cash loser.
They are judgement choices where maybe another player you considered at that price has done better.
Agree thanks Sasha and Welshy, just playing devils advocate for my team. I could throw Papalli and turbo in there as well but they're not going anywhere also, unless someone can tell me about a must have FRF/2RF cheapie?
mulvy wrote:Is anyone else getting a bunch of junk/notifications/profile pic etc at the top of the page above the banner or just me?
Welshy wrote:
would consider not one of them to be errors mate
ET hit his BE in 20 less gametime than he would usually get
All others made money and KBrom went exactly where he should of been expected to go 35-45 range
mulvy wrote:Is anyone else getting a bunch of junk/notifications/profile pic etc at the top of the page above the banner or just me?
MrCashman wrote:my tv broke wrote:Burns seems like an 18 pt avg to me
SI wrote:
Turbo will have some massive games.
ET in line for 80 I would say yes. massive head knock and Tigers up big gave him a rest.Boozecluez wrote:
To be fair, was ET expected to get 80? He played 61 mins for his 40 pts
Welshy wrote:
ET in line for 80 I would say yes. massive head knock and Tigers up big gave him a rest.
Welshy wrote:No one mentioning Kaysa either, played the full 80 no IDG in sight King on extended bench