GreenMachine wrote:
Way more than 31% have no clue, and you're at the top end of them captain hindsight
Is that why I'm doing better than you?
NRL Fantasy Fanatics - A place for discussion of NRL Fantasy / Virtual Sports / Super Coach and other Fantasy Sports
GreenMachine wrote:
Way more than 31% have no clue, and you're at the top end of them captain hindsight
TBO wrote:
Is that why I'm doing better than you?
GreenMachine wrote:Just to ensure TBOs standard twisting and turning doesn't skew the original point...
Those with Smith and Macca/McInnes already or even the more maverick Mcinnes/Macca are actually close to my heart gun players and dick heads not aimed at you
GreenMachine wrote:
Let me know your team name know so I can keep an eye on you and have a giggle at year end
With Arsen and DK ever present in the forum and now you, I'm pretty motivated to treat it seriously now this year
TBO wrote:
Now you've moved the goal posts, dickhead.
TBO wrote:
The difference between Gallen and Surgess is that Gallen as I pointed out earlier is playing out his last NRL season and his scores won't improve over time. Surgess on the other hand is just in a run of poor form until last week when he scored over 55 points. There is more potential with owning Sam Burgess.
Gallen's price hasn't bottomed out and I think if his average of sub 50 continues he will lose at another $60k until he is bottomed out.
Now would it be better to hedge your losses now and upgrade to a tier 1 forward or risk losing another $60K on a player that doesn't look like he will improve? You would say after he bottomed out that you should've spent that $60K that you wouldn't have lost on a better player wouldn't you?
But then again, if Gallen scores a try this weekend with a few TBs then he might score a 71 and prove me wrong. Maybe against the Tigers (round 9) he might score over 70 by running at Luke Brooks all game?
GreenMachine wrote:
Just trying to ensure I align with whatever your team is, because I disagree with whatever it is. Don't like after-the-fact smarties
GreenMachine wrote:
Just trying to ensure I align with whatever your team is, because I disagree with whatever it is. Don't like after-the-fact smarties
TBO wrote:
The difference between Gallen and Surgess is that Gallen as I pointed out earlier is playing out his last NRL season and his scores won't improve over time. Surgess on the other hand is just in a run of poor form until last week when he scored over 55 points. There is more potential with owning Sam Burgess.
Gallen's price hasn't bottomed out and I think if his average of sub 50 continues he will lose at another $60k until he is bottomed out.
Now would it be better to hedge your losses now and upgrade to a tier 1 forward or risk losing another $60K on a player that doesn't look like he will improve? You would say after he bottomed out that you should've spent that $60K that you wouldn't have lost on a better player wouldn't you?
But then again, if Gallen scores a try this weekend with a few TBs then he might score a 71 and prove me wrong. Maybe against the Tigers (round 9) he might score over 70 by running at Luke Brooks all game?
Weird thing is your name is familiar even from sportal days but I don't actually remember you as being an utter twat. Clearly just didn't engage with you in the past.TBO wrote:
Sounds like you're going to be the Captain Hindsight at year end
GreenMachine wrote:
Weird thing is your name is familiar even from sportal days but I don't actually remember you as being an utter twat. Clearly just didn't engage with you in the past.
I ask a very standard, if not thought provoking question for the masses and look where we are at now. Taking everyone towards a page 51 party.
I'll end it here because you're clearly a troll, I'm clearly biting and I'm disrespecting TLT and the forum having other posters
Mighty Fishes wrote:
Yeah he was on sportal. He was wishing injuries on players
Mighty Fishes wrote:
Yeah he was on sportal. He was wishing injuries on players
Bren wrote:
So you are now saying to trade Gallen to Sam Burgess as he has more potential? Another sideways trade. Trading out Gallen at this point is absolute stupidity. If you don't trade out Gallen you do not lose any of your investment. Why trade out a player who will average 50 odd or thereabouts come seasons end? Why trade out a player who scores the majority of their points in base stats when their first 3 games of the season has been a mixture of a blow out and stop/start games? Many teams will be running Gallen in their side (injury permitting) to finish the season as a 4th reserve or better. Why trade out such a player at this point of the season when there are other areas in a Fantasy side not providing that consistent reliable score that Gallen is each and every week?
I would like to hear your prediction for Gallen for the next 5 rounds and for the entire season. Points scored and dollar value.
And... GO!!!
pm888 wrote:@Mighty Fishes I actually think johnston has played alright so far. apart from being humiliated by barnett he is doing well.
for cricton to stay on means that sutton is the ideal 5/8th which i don't think is the way forward.
burn back next week for me