Ultimate League Thread 3

Yep and you should have scrapped around for a half who was playing. No point having a 40 point player as your 2nd back up front rower.

To sum up my teams season injury wise Aitken probably breaks his wrist scoring a try, what a fuck knuckle...looking forward to my message from KFP giving me shit for not trading Aitken to him and then getting injured.

Not counting my chickens before they hatch. But, I need 32 points from A. Woods, E. Taylor and B. French to score a win this week.

Reckon @ryno_ has me in this game. Losing Hurrell in the first 10mins, Taupau being forgotten and Moylan just after half time has hurt me. Happy with the rest tho.

B/L wrote:Yep and you should have scrapped around for a half who was playing. No point having a 40 point player as your 2nd back up front rower.

To sum up my teams season injury wise Aitken probably breaks his wrist scoring a try, what a fuck knuckle...looking forward to my message from KFP giving me shit for not trading Aitken to him and then getting injured.

Everyone has gone into a round without a Reserve in a position.

As I explained, I held Alvaro due to LAM only scoring well since Vaughan was out. If LAM goes back to scoring like before then he would be getting the chop and I'd be starting Alvaro again, along with Tims.

They are counting Thompsons 0 and not adding Guerra's score. Maybe they don't count late warm up injuries?

Looks like they are gonna fuck me good

B/L wrote:Yep, but he still gets Guerras 43 which is more then Thompson would make anyway.

Why wouldnt you have a reserve half, Alvaro & Fitzgibbon are rubbish, that has just rubber stamped your relgation.

Thompsons avg is 44

I thought they would have added it by now, but no way they won't by the time next round opens.

SI wrote:

Everyone has gone into a round without a Reserve in a position.

As I explained, I held Alvaro due to LAM only scoring well since Vaughan was out.  If LAM goes back to scoring like before then he would be getting the chop and I'd be starting Alvaro again, along with Tims.

Well given it lost you the match and confirmed your relegation I would say it was a bad move.

B/L wrote:

SI wrote:

Everyone has gone into a round without a Reserve in a position.

As I explained, I held Alvaro due to LAM only scoring well since Vaughan was out.  If LAM goes back to scoring like before then he would be getting the chop and I'd be starting Alvaro again, along with Tims.

Well given it lost you the match and confirmed your relegation I would say it was a bad move.

Well given that it is giving advice after the fact that you are best at, you should change your Username to C/H.

B/L complaining about injuries and being unlucky is hilarious. Firstly because its B/L whinging. Secondly because he's been kissed on this dick this season.

@mearcats, top match. Thats a sneak peek at your GF gents & B/L.

Who do I write my complaint to?

Spectre wrote:Who do I write my complaint to?

It's funny how normally a player that is out gets the grey coloured zero, but Thomson got the green coloured zero.  Starting to think they are indeed actually counting him.

If that is the case then if it is not specified in the rules (I can't see it in there) that if a late withdrawal is deemed to have played and hence you cop the zero, then with our rankings for relegation being close, I will take the relegation if it comes down to us 2.  Pretty simple really, you should have won our match up this week, and I can't see where it says that a late withdrawal counts towards your score verses getting an Emergency for a non-player.

ryno_ wrote:B/L complaining about injuries and being unlucky is hilarious. Firstly because its B/L whinging. Secondly because he's been kissed on this dick this season.

@mearcats, top match. Thats a sneak peek at your GF gents & B/L.

Absolute belter of a match mate, thought you were home this morning when I looked. Lafai getting 60 and some of my boys underperforming (not unusual) worked out for ya.

Gutherson could be gone for the season tho... Sorry bout that.

I didn't get a score over 45. Someone warm up a seat in league 2 for me

Mearcats wrote:So the trade lockout deadline is Monday night? Are we able to change that to Wednesday night? Is everyone ok with that? I just think that with lockout quite often not being lifted until Tuesday, any one that wanted to make any further trades is going to be unable to. Also, following this round there will be another group of DPP changes to players meaning there may be some more interest in trades.

Just a thought and of course everyone would have to agree but thought it would be beneficial to all to have the lock up mid week instead of on Monday.

Get rid of it all together imo. No one is going to hand over players just to help an other player.

Sauce Reed wrote:

Mearcats wrote:So the trade lockout deadline is Monday night? Are we able to change that to Wednesday night? Is everyone ok with that? I just think that with lockout quite often not being lifted until Tuesday, any one that wanted to make any further trades is going to be unable to. Also, following this round there will be another group of DPP changes to players meaning there may be some more interest in trades.

Just a thought and of course everyone would have to agree but thought it would be beneficial to all to have the lock up mid week instead of on Monday.

Get rid of it all together imo. No one is going to hand over players just to help an other player.

It was suspected of happening in the first year we ran this.

I wouldn't mind moving the deadline as said above no one is going to be handing over players for the sake of pushing someone else. Plus anything deemed too excessive by league members can just be vetoed by LM

Agree with Mearcats though, needs to be the Wednesday-the Monday it isn't even open.

I will push L2 Wednesday then at least leaves some time for debate

Is the L1 Comissioner able to push the Deadline to Wednesday at the earliest as well please if everyone agrees?