by filthridden Wed Jul 19, 2017 5:43 pm
Rippin and Tearin wrote:
I understand where you are trying to go with this but I don't like the generalisation to be honest. There are a ton of flaws to the logic too IMO. One illustration is that by in large Polynesians are in the same boat in NZ playing Union too, yet the above issues you raise don't really translate.
What all that says to me is there are systematic issues at the Warriors that have nothing to do with race.
Gotta agree with R&T.
Saying they don't have the stamina/mental toughness at NRL level because they get bigger earlier in their lives? Mate, I played lower level league in West Auckland and everyone except our lily white ass punk team were twice our size. These guys are competing against guys their own size (except when they played skinny white-boy teams like ours
) so I don't see that as a valid reason. Even if this was the case, they'd be found out at trials for youth rep teams or the NYC team if they got that far. The Warriors NYC team was great for a number of years even though they (most times) had little size advantage over other NYC teams - ironically it was the smaller players for the Warriors who starred for them - Lolohea, Johnson, Locke, Taylor, Henry, Tuimavave, Kata, Slaimankhel and often not due to the forwards dominating, more individual plays.
Players like SST are better for leaving the Warriors, that is true... but he would've had a hell of a hard road to get to the Warriors first grade team before making that switch, it certainly wouldn't have been all "I'm bigger therefore better".