NRL Fantasy 2019 Part 22

Welshy wrote:

i wouldn't be dumping Macca for him, only 2 rounds in and Macca has had almost zero attacking involvement, that will come in some rounds, others not. Full confidence still in Macca going over 52 minimum this year

Welshy wrote:

Expecting his PM to drop a bit and be dictated by game flow etc

But he has at least shown the ability to be at the very least extremley dependable in his scoring (low score when playing 40+ minutes is 35)

Look to be the No.1 prop option with the Tigers this season, plus some players just elevate. Main example here being Easy E last year.

Twal isn't a must trade in but in the conversation to play well above his average this season in the tricky FR position. I feel like If I miss him he will queitly go around averaging 48-50 and make me regret jumping on now

CubanMafiaSandSlugs wrote:

Very well justified Welshy.

Welshy wrote:

i wouldn't be dumping Macca for him, only 2 rounds in and Macca has had almost zero attacking involvement, that will come in some rounds, others not. Full confidence still in Macca going over 52 minimum this year

Welshy wrote:

I think he goes above where he is priced now for sure, but the real crux is how much he elevates his scoring by? if he averages say 45 i don't think its worth the trade in as he likely needs to be shipped on again later.

What you think?

He's at a good enough price he doesn't have to be rushed in, but for my side where Tatola is starting with Fifi I think I need him or someone of his ilk now

I'm also looking at Bunty. thoughts?

CubanMafiaSandSlugs wrote:

I think it's definitely worth the risk. Madge has a habit of elevating players, but also a habbit of swapping forward packs around, particularly front rowers. Loves to keep everyone accountable and fresh.

It's a wait and see for me. I'd rather just bypass Twal and get Taupau and Klemmer, along with Fifi.

wolfking wrote:Going back to the Dogs, I'm surprised RFM is getting dropped.  Dogs need attack, and he's one player that can produce something.  Interesting Holland keeps his spot.  Pay is absolutely mad for breaking up the Holland/Smith combo.  Hopefully he goes back to it and if he does, I'm tempted to back Holland again.

Welshy wrote:

Any thoughts on Bunty?

and why the great shakes on Klem? avg of 51 when playing over 60 minutes?

Welshy wrote:

Any thoughts on Bunty?

and why the great shakes on Klem? avg of 51 when playing over 60 minutes?

rhinoceroo wrote:Dunno why people are talking about Twal and not McLean, who's much more of a real life gun and should be Cowboys main metre-eater with Tolo out. Not really needing a prop myself but if I was I'd be on McLean.

CubanMafiaSandSlugs wrote:

I don't have any thoughts on Bunty. Warriors props are a dogs breakfast. I can't see any standouts except LAM and he's on the bench so go figure.

Mr Fernando wrote:jai arrow didn't get any dally m points

mattnz wrote:

Arrow played the first 55 minutes in game 1. If the game had been close expect he would have been back on the last 10 minutes for 65 total. So 65-70, but if game is lost he may not get a 2nd stint

SI wrote:

Very surprised by RFM as well.  Elliott's stats aren't great but I know they seem to love him.

Rapture_NRL wrote:

SI wrote:

Very surprised by RFM as well.  Elliott's stats aren't great but I know they seem to love him.

Cause he gets naked for the boys. RFM too much of a prude