NRL Fantasy 2019 Part 41

Weiland wrote:

You can trade in any position if the player is in the reserves.

Well he didn't make it very clear then. If that's the case I would rather bring in a keeper 2RF for roughly the same price especially since ARey has proven to be injury prone in the last couple of seasons.

Does anyone really give a shit about Seibold V Bennett? I feel like besides a few journos no one gives a toss

TBO wrote:

Garner isn't a sell yet tbh.  He could still be playing 60 mins and scoring 40-45

Cheers mate.

Thinking too, Garner could even come on at lock and then play the last 20 in the second row or something.

Mulvy wrote:

I've max traded and would likely use one next week and one or two the following week and then none until round 12 unless something drastic occurs. I'm looking to get my final team ASAP and then hold on and hope. Yeah can't get them all. CHT is the main one I've missed. I don't think I'll be getting Waddell.

Just remember the law of averages as it is a long season! When injury or players getting rested for the finals in the latter stages of the season just be prepared to burn through a few necessary trades.

wolfking wrote:

Cheers mate.

Thinking too, Garner could even come on at lock and then play the last 20 in the second row or something.

Would you be comfortable playing him, or would you give one of your cash cows backs a run?

Adrianoooo wrote:Does anyone really give a shit about Seibold V Bennett? I feel like besides a few journos no one gives a toss

Yeah same here, similar to alot of 'rivalry' hype they beat up, if it exists and u feel it then it is real and great. No amount of dickhead journo is going to improve a rivalry. They brought it up last night on Nrl 360 actually, asking the players (Graham) why they themselves don't sell rivalry hype more, and this was coming from the king of headline creating Kent.

wolfking wrote:

Cheers mate.

Thinking too, Garner could even come on at lock and then play the last 20 in the second row or something.

Well that's what I'm doing anyway lol Like I said earlier I'm only basing my decision based on what the Dragons did with Lawrie last week and now he's in the starting position again. People were saying to trade him but I didn't pull the trigger.

I will only trade Garner next week IF all of the following happens this weekend:

- Plays less than 50 minutes this weekend
- Scores less than 35
- Not in the starting lineup next weekend

Otherwise I just think it's a waste of a trade.

Was looking for a cow to get rid of sele with, not that comfortable with any of them atm.

TBO wrote:

Well that's what I'm doing anyway lol Like I said earlier I'm only basing my decision based on what the Dragons did with Lawrie last week and now he's in the starting position again.  People were saying to trade him but I didn't pull the trigger.

I will only trade Garner next week IF all of the following happens this weekend:

- Plays less than 50 minutes this weekend
- Scores less than 35
- Not in the starting lineup next weekend

Otherwise I just think it's a waste of a trade.  

I'm inclined to agree. I've also still got Lawrie and Bird - still some upside there.

Mulvy wrote:

Would you be comfortable playing him, or would you give one of your cash cows backs a run?

I've currently got Garner on standby in the loop:

4. Sele (Does not play and Panthers play 4th game).
5. Capewell (Sharks play 3rd game).
6. Garner (Tigers play 6th game).

I will only loop Garner (and take the risk) if Capewell does not score more than 35-40 in his game. I don't expect him to miss another 12 tackles this weekend though so he'll probably score in the low 40s.

Khany wrote:Was looking for a cow to get rid of sele with, not that comfortable with any of them atm.

Keep him mate, i am. For now. Surely one other in ur team can go first ? Sele's BE and unclear scenario could be worth waiting a week or two.

TBO wrote:

I've currently got Garner on standby in the loop:

4. Sele (Does not play and Panthers play 4th game).
5. Capewell (Sharks play 3rd game).
6. Garner (Tigers play 6th game).

I will only loop Garner (and take the risk) if Capewell does not score more than 35-40 in his game.  I don't expect him to miss another 12 tackles this weekend though so he'll probably score in the low 40s.

I'm all for looping but my trades this week give me 21 green dots.

Khany wrote:Was looking for a cow to get rid of sele with, not that comfortable with any of them atm.

I'm keeping Sele as I'm not convinced that he's played his last game for the season.  Plus you have to remember that when Origin comes around there will be some shuffling in the forwards you'd imagine with Sele back in the 13.

Also he's good for me at the moment because of the loophole option as a NPR (as I mentioned in the post above).

Revraiser wrote:

Keep him mate, i am. For now. Surely one other in ur team can go first ?  Sele's BE and unclear scenario could be worth waiting a week or two.

+1 Absolutely.

Well I could keep Sele.......

Mulvy wrote:

I'm all for looping but my trades this week give me 21 green dots.

What trades are they and how much cash will you have left?

Keep mentioning Sele, there's a form line here somewhere.....

Adrianoooo wrote:Does anyone really give a shit about Seibold V Bennett? I feel like besides a few journos no one gives a toss

Life long bronco fan here and I COULD.NOT.GIVE.A.TOSS

Sorry accidental downvote

Khany wrote:Was looking for a cow to get rid of sele with, not that comfortable with any of them atm.

Had pencilled in Sele to Lomax but I'm really not that keen on Lomax. Going to bank the trades this week.