HomeOzymandias wrote:Well, after the high of captain Papy's 4-try explosion I came down to Earth with a bump as Fogarty ended up with a zero
That will get you an EM won't it? Might be better than zero.
NRL Supercoach 2021
Hannah2- Posts : 591
Reputation : 449
Join date : 2016-02-27
That will get you an EM won't it? Might be better than zero.
Ozymandias- Posts : 2456
Reputation : 969
Join date : 2017-03-01
Hannah2 wrote:
That will get you an EM won't it? Might be better than zero.
Unfortunately not ....
The remaining players on your Substitutes list don't score, unless an automatic emergency is required to replace ONE zero-scoring player in your Starting 17 who didn't play.
.... if you play and get a zero then it's just bad luck.
t43597- Posts : 429
Reputation : 144
Join date : 2019-01-29
Cook VC tonight along with Riki & Niu on field.
Clack Bocks- Posts : 2330
Reputation : 446
Join date : 2015-09-26
I’m playing someone in my work league who has, and captained, Alex Johnstone.
Hannah2- Posts : 591
Reputation : 449
Join date : 2016-02-27
I'm trying to free money for Grant. I have AFB who is injured so thinking of trading for Zane Musgrove.
His BE is 13, so he should make money, but I'm not sure of his security, and he is likely to be suspended.
Any thoughts? Is there a better choice around same money or a bit more?
His BE is 13, so he should make money, but I'm not sure of his security, and he is likely to be suspended.
Any thoughts? Is there a better choice around same money or a bit more?
Guest- Guest
Hannah2 wrote:I'm trying to free money for Grant. I have AFB who is injured so thinking of trading for Zane Musgrove.
His BE is 13, so he should make money, but I'm not sure of his security, and he is likely to be suspended.
Any thoughts? Is there a better choice around same money or a bit more?
Not sure if you have him, Ryan James is someone I'd look at. Minutes are consistent.
Hannah2- Posts : 591
Reputation : 449
Join date : 2016-02-27
WT2K wrote:
Not sure if you have him, Ryan James is someone I'd look at. Minutes are consistent.
Yeah, thanks, I have him.
Just a bit worried re Musgrove, not sure why, lol
Guest- Guest
Hannah2 wrote:
Yeah, thanks, I have him.
Just a bit worried re Musgrove, not sure why, lol
I don't trust him with suspensions! Coach does like Musgrove though.
Teeth Eater- Posts : 4827
Reputation : 2307
Join date : 2018-02-20
Anyone not bringing Walker in (those who don't already have him)?
I'd made it through the whole day avoiding it as I just couldn't bring myself to trade Brooks out. He's been scoring very well and still has a low BE. The complete definition of someone I would never trade out under normal circumstances.
Just checked what Walker's BE is, though, and it's -105??? How's that even possible? Anyway, I reversed my trades and very unwillingly traded out Brooks for Walker. Hated doing it but I guess it has to be done, innit?
I'd made it through the whole day avoiding it as I just couldn't bring myself to trade Brooks out. He's been scoring very well and still has a low BE. The complete definition of someone I would never trade out under normal circumstances.
Just checked what Walker's BE is, though, and it's -105??? How's that even possible? Anyway, I reversed my trades and very unwillingly traded out Brooks for Walker. Hated doing it but I guess it has to be done, innit?
Hannah2- Posts : 591
Reputation : 449
Join date : 2016-02-27
Teeth Eater wrote:Anyone not bringing Walker in (those who don't already have him)?
I'd made it through the whole day avoiding it as I just couldn't bring myself to trade Brooks out. He's been scoring very well and still has a low BE. The complete definition of someone I would never trade out under normal circumstances.
Just checked what Walker's BE is, though, and it's -105??? How's that even possible? Anyway, I reversed my trades and very unwillingly traded out Brooks for Walker. Hated doing it but I guess it has to be done, innit?
I already have Walker, so no decision here, but I think you've done the right thing, and think of all the extra points you can score with that extra money. You'll be able to afford another gun!
Teeth Eater- Posts : 4827
Reputation : 2307
Join date : 2018-02-20
Hannah2 wrote:
I already have Walker, so no decision here, but I think you've done the right thing, and think of all the extra points you can score with that extra money. You'll be able to afford another gun!
Yeah, I must do something with my front row next week, I think.
Guest- Guest
Got the peach in this week. Flicked Roberts.
Clack Bocks- Posts : 2330
Reputation : 446
Join date : 2015-09-26
Brought in walker and condom for the cash
t43597- Posts : 429
Reputation : 144
Join date : 2019-01-29
Finally brought in D.Fifita. Flicked Mead and Faas for Fifita and Condon
Hannah2- Posts : 591
Reputation : 449
Join date : 2016-02-27
Got Papenhuyzen and Tino not playing, and my depth is mediocre. CTW is Capewell, Staines, Opacic, Laurie, Nui, Simonsson and nuff, so no cover this round. Thinking Liddle to Grant and Tino to someone: $513 000 either 2RF or CTW. Any suggestions?
Hannah2- Posts : 591
Reputation : 449
Join date : 2016-02-27
I have only $513 000, so can't afford Too or Nofo, if I get Grant
Guest- Guest
Hannah2 wrote:Got Papenhuyzen and Tino not playing, and my depth is mediocre. CTW is Capewell, Staines, Opacic, Laurie, Nui, Simonsson and nuff, so no cover this round. Thinking Liddle to Grant and Tino to someone: $513 000 either 2RF or CTW. Any suggestions?
Luke Thompson
Hannah2- Posts : 591
Reputation : 449
Join date : 2016-02-27
Yes, I looked at Luke Thompson, good BE set to make some $$ is there a downside?
Guest- Guest
Hannah2 wrote:Yes, I looked at Luke Thompson, good BE set to make some $$ is there a downside?
Don't think there's too much downside, named at prop instead of lock but I think he still sees the same minutes
Hannah2- Posts : 591
Reputation : 449
Join date : 2016-02-27
WT2K wrote:
Don't think there's too much downside, named at prop instead of lock but I think he still sees the same minutes
Thanks, I think that's what I'll do.
Similar topics
