NRL Fantasy 2021 Part 7 - Trial edition

Rabbits21 wrote:Tell me why not to start with Macca, why is it a bad idea? Dragons will be bottom 2 and with it being such a fast game he’s likely to make 60 tackles a week.... I see value there in Macca and Turpin if playing 80mins.... could get Cook in later on

Aardvark wrote:

That L6 troll by @filthridden is like an onion, so many layers...Rabbits and the tanty, then Welshy and the angry response, then rest of the forum with the ongoing fallout and finally a few late comers

Have I told you why I don’t like Andrew McCullough as a pick?

Rabbits21 wrote:Tell me why not to start with Macca, why is it a bad idea? Dragons will be bottom 2 and with it being such a fast game he’s likely to make 60 tackles a week.... I see value there in Macca and Turpin if playing 80mins.... could get Cook in later on

Mulvy wrote:Revs catching up on the thread:

Welshy wrote:I'm going to start putting my scoring system on peoples teams again with my predicted score range. post them up and I'll start

Mighty Fishes wrote:

Rabbits21 wrote:Tell me why not to start with Macca, why is it a bad idea? Dragons will be bottom 2 and with it being such a fast game he’s likely to make 60 tackles a week.... I see value there in Macca and Turpin if playing 80mins.... could get Cook in later on

Someone said it earlier that was enough to put me off him. Hes getting older not better

Mulvy wrote:

Didn't realise he was available in the halves TBH
Wallace 50-150
Wallace 50-150 Wallace 50-150 Wallace 50-150
Wallace 50-150 Wallace 50-150
Wallace 50-150 Wallace 50-150
Wallace 50-150 Wallace 50-150
Wallace 50-150 Wallace 50-150 Wallace 50-150

Wallace 50-150 Wallace 50-150 Wallace 50-150 Wallace 50-150

Wallace 50-150 Wallace 50-150 Wallace 50-150 Wallace 50-150

low end predicted average 850 - 2550

high end seems a little unrealistic

Welshy wrote:

Mulvy wrote:

Didn't realise he was available in the halves TBH
Wallace 50-150
Wallace 50-150 Wallace 50-150 Wallace 50-150
Wallace 50-150 Wallace 50-150
Wallace 50-150 Wallace 50-150
Wallace 50-150 Wallace 50-150
Wallace 50-150 Wallace 50-150 Wallace 50-150

Wallace 50-150 Wallace 50-150 Wallace 50-150 Wallace 50-150

Wallace 50-150 Wallace 50-150 Wallace 50-150 Wallace 50-150

low end predicted average 850 - 2550

high end seems a little unrealistic

standard-issue wrote:

I was thinking more the low end looked a little unrealistic.

Welshy wrote:I'm going to start putting my scoring system on peoples teams again with my predicted score range. post them up and I'll start

standard-issue wrote:


I was thinking more the low end looked a little unrealistic.

Welshy wrote:

standard-issue wrote:

I was thinking more the low end looked a little unrealistic.

with a team full of Wallaces?
Must be on crack son plus I forgot the captain score, so 900!!

Mighty Fishes wrote:

Get it??

Rabbits21 wrote:

I had just finished work not a good shift today  and when I saw L6 I was just a bit shocked and disappointed that’s all. I don’t care about the down voters, it happens to me lots, I can see why some thought I was whinging but it wasn’t my intention to whine even if it came out like that....

SoylentGreen wrote:

Turpin
Crichton, Tino, Watson
Fifita, Riki
Cleary, Lam
Averillo, Roberts
Teddy, Pappy, Doueihi

JBrailey, Davey, Liddle, Hoy,
Hola, Niu, Laurie, Simpkins.