Bethany_B wrote:
All the mail I've seen is that Paix has pushed Turpin out of the starting spot.
he is starting in the trial this week. that is the extent of the 'mail' tbh. everything else is just hopeful broncos fans and assumptions.
NRL Fantasy Fanatics - A place for discussion of NRL Fantasy / Virtual Sports / Super Coach and other Fantasy Sports
Bethany_B wrote:
All the mail I've seen is that Paix has pushed Turpin out of the starting spot.
Chewie wrote:What's everyones thoughts on Tuilagi?
Bethany_B wrote:Am I insane for running Paix and Randall as my only hookers? It would let me have all three of Haas/Angus/Fifita, as well as Hudson Young.
$30k bank
Paix
Haas, Angus, Bullemor
Fifita, Young
Cleary, Ilias
Penisini, Tago
Papy, Critta, Coates
Randall, Nanai, Amone, J King
J Croker, Walters, Howarth, Koula
The reason why I'm so high on Hudson Young is that he played 13 games starting on the edge last year, and played 80 minutes in every single one of them, for an average of 60.1 across those 13 games (so genuine keeper level). In fact, in his whole career, he has only had a single game in which he started on the edge but didn't play 80 minutes (round 11 2019, played 71 mins)
Howdy easytiger,easytiger wrote:Trent Barrett specifically said after the first trial that Burton "he'll obviously be our dominant playmaker and our dominant kicker". Take from that what you will
mattnz wrote:
He is signed to another team for next year and they have Lucy leaving as well. Not sure if they put him ahead of Garner and have 0 starting EDG players for next season.
filthridden wrote:
People have got to get past this idea that players go down the pecking order if they are leaving the following year.
Especially in teams like the Tigers where the coach will do well just to survive this season.
It may happen towards the end of the year when teams are out of contention for the finals but not before.
Chewie wrote:
Yeah, as a coach I would put my best available players on the field regardless if they are leaving next season or not.
MayorofAlburquerque wrote:
Howdy easytiger,
Thank you - I see someone is even more fantasy attuned than I.
The Mayor.
mattnz wrote:
He is signed to another team for next year and they have Lucy leaving as well. Not sure if they put him ahead of Garner and have 0 starting EDG players for next season.
mattnz wrote:
Thats my HOK plan. Would look to add Cotter if named at 13 as well.
Young wasn't on my radar, but fits my profile of the kind of player I look for.
The issue is they have CHN, Young, Elliott and Whitehead. Even with rumours that Whitehead may play in the even more stacked MID rotation, being Ricky, he is sure to rotate all these EDG players through the season. Last year Whitehead was the only consistent thing in the whole Raiders pack, everyone else was rotated throughout the season, and now he is the first to get moved this year.
Milchcow wrote:Tohu Harris is considered a 13 now, won't play edge.
mattnz wrote:
He is signed to another team for next year and they have Lucy leaving as well. Not sure if they put him ahead of Garner and have 0 starting EDG players for next season.
Is he though? Has either club made an announcement yet? If it has actually happened it is very strange. The big question is why does Manly want another 2RF or why would an up and coming 2RF want to go to a club with so much competition from a club with next to no competition.mattnz wrote:
He is signed to another team for next year and they have Lucy leaving as well. Not sure if they put him ahead of Garner and have 0 starting EDG players for next season.
The Pascoe Fiasco wrote:
Is he though? Has either club made an announcement yet? If it has actually happened it is very strange. The big question is why does Manly want another 2RF or why would an up and coming 2RF want to go to a club with so much competition from a club with next to no competition.