NRL Fantasy 2023 Part 10 - Look in my Eyes. I'll diagnose what ails you

Is anyone tempted by Joe Stimson? I'm not sure if I can do it, but I'd be lying if I said I wasn't tempted.

my tv broke wrote:Updating the ownership stats.

Looks like there are only about 110k 'active' teams.. which heavily skews the 'ownership' stats you see in the app.

As an example, I Katoa is in 81k of those 110k teams. So his actual ownership is more like 74%.

Cleary was captained by 59k teams in round 1, about 53% of teams.

Is there a way you can show "active team ownership" on site?

my tv broke wrote:Updating the ownership stats.

Looks like there are only about 110k 'active' teams.. which heavily skews the 'ownership' stats you see in the app.

As an example, I Katoa is in 81k of those 110k teams. So his actual ownership is more like 74%.

Cleary was captained by 59k teams in round 1, about 53% of teams.

How many of those 'active' teams play draft?

rhinoceroo wrote:

Is there a way you can show "active team ownership" on site?

Yeah, pretty easily, I was thinking I will update it.

Will confuse 90% of users I guess (will put some kind of note on there to clarify)

Chewie wrote:

How many of those 'active' teams play draft?

No idea - it doesn't take that into consideration (I'm only looking at the standard fantasy).

EDIT - as easytiger said - yeah draft is self-contained and separate entirely.

easytiger wrote:

MCK debuted back in 2014, Host in 2016. I think we all know what to expect from these players and both are borderline first graders.

^^ This x 100

Chewie wrote:

How many of those 'active' teams play draft?

I would've thought Draft teams are self-contained - probably shouldn't be represented in overall rankings at all?

GarethEllisismyDad wrote:

I like this point, I will do a deeper dive, i think sharks can’t play much worse than they did in that second half

It’s also more I have hooker cover and not edge, and I do think he’s an upgrade on garner

Smiths £ is the facilitator


Update 8 missed tackles for Wilton last game for minus 16, that must be an anomaly

Ram for 113m and had 38 tackles,

Update2 he has a career 2.2 missed tackles, not ideal but not a disaster

A Wilton trade in did actually cross my mind too. My main concern with him was Graham taking minutes from him but that didn't happen game 1. Not sure if HIA or Sin Bin had any impact on the plans though.

I also just couldn't fit both he and Garner in (yay chose Garner )

Scoring wise previous stats say he should be good for high 40's average with some tries along the way. The Sharks were bad and yeah that many missed tackles seems an anomaly for him.

But for me this week it's probably him or Ford and think Ford wins out.

mrbrownstone wrote:Is anyone tempted by Joe Stimson? I'm not sure if I can do it, but I'd be lying if I said I wasn't tempted.

Real tempted to get a bit of a Stimmy. Sure he's not the best player in the world, but if he's going to play 80 every week he will probably make 40 tackles and that's enough to make some decent cash.

Rotinaj wrote:

Real tempted to get a bit of a Stimmy. Sure he's not the best player in the world, but if he's going to play 80 every week he will probably make 40 tackles and that's enough to make some decent cash.

He`s an interesting option, however finding myself leaning more towards Ford

easytiger wrote:

I would've thought Draft teams are self-contained - probably shouldn't be represented in overall rankings at all?

cool, cool , cool, I haven't played draft so didn't know if these teams were included or not

mrbrownstone wrote:Is anyone tempted by Joe Stimson? I'm not sure if I can do it, but I'd be lying if I said I wasn't tempted.

I think I am more tempted by Bullemor

slats86 wrote:

I think I am more tempted by Bullemor

Give yourself an uppercut m8. Remember when he was the second coming of CP13 and turned out to be a  20 point plodder....

Aiden Toleman 2.0 with less minutes

mrbrownstone wrote:Is anyone tempted by Joe Stimson? I'm not sure if I can do it, but I'd be lying if I said I wasn't tempted.

He isn't the most athletic looking edge forward around but, he gets the job done

mrbrownstone wrote:Is anyone tempted by Joe Stimson? I'm not sure if I can do it, but I'd be lying if I said I wasn't tempted.

Still have PTSD from getting in 2020 after saying he was rubbish and an avoid.

5 missed tackles and 39m not encouraging

The Goat Boys wrote:
He`s an interesting option, however finding myself leaning more towards Ford

Don't know if I'm just being a nervous Warriors fan, but do we think Curran will impact Ford's minutes pretty quickly?

Finally got around to throwing up my team tracker for the year.

I'll probably hold trades for the round so long as team lists are kind.

Kind of surprised how many people are looking to flick Uto already, am I missing something there? Looks like a hold to me if he keeps getting 50odd mins.

Snatchpato wrote:I'm not going to overreact regarding EButch. Without the sinbin (+7) and extra 10 mins (+7 at a .7ppm) he hits 45 while being priced at 39. Roosters played badly, so he got 0 attacking stats. When the Roosters attack starts to click I see him pumping out some big scores. Not jumping off until their bye, gunna give him 3 chances to impress.

Edit: thanks Deadelus for the update

As a non owner I'm looking to bring him in post bye

The low score first up should stall any cash gen

Great base without attacking upside I don't see why he can't average 50

Snatchpato wrote:Can someone summarise what happened? Always rated Booze and low-key thought he was the most underrated fantasy player.

It escalated pretty quick, so probably easier just to read and make your own judgement rather than a biased summary.


But since you asked..

Rotinaj wrote:

Don't know if I'm just being a nervous Warriors fan, but do we think Curran will impact Ford's minutes pretty quickly?

I thought Ford was one of the Warriors best on the weekend, hard to see him being dropped if he continues that form.

Anyone have strong feelings on CHN vs Sutton as a Garner replacement?

Think I'm leaning Sutton at this stage.