Pieman wrote:
Even the fact that roberts went from centre of the year to not - suggest he isnt not playing as good footy as he was at the titans. That ruins the roberts argument. Everything else is irrelevant and There is literally nothing to suggest the club didnt want him, they tried to keep him in a dodgy way apparently, so yeh mate, keep with the conspiracy theories.
He had a purple patch of a few games where he was untouchable at GC that got him the award, but he is playing better football for longer stretches at the Broncos. Fact. His defence has much improved, work rate increased and effectiveness increased. He'd have to be front runner for the Centre of the Year... maybe Lafai?
Illegally trying to decrease his contract value =/= trying to keep him.
Refusing to pay peanuts in legal fees that they rightfully owed him =/= trying to keep him.
Boyd, Roberts, Moga, Blair. All unwanted by their previous club.Pieman wrote:Who are the 4, not taking injury into consideration? Blair and moga are the only 2.
He was in the Raiders Toyota Cup squad that beat the Broncos in the NYC's inaugural year, Croker kept him out of the starting side. It's why he was good mates with Vidot. Raiders dropped him, their loss is our gain. But, as you said, its not a subject you know much about. I assume, in that context, that "it" is NRL.Pieman wrote:Reed made his fucking debut at the broncos haha. Amazing if you want to count him.
Nope.Pieman wrote:No, vidot played his best years at the raiders.
Why wouldnt I? Origin player at Brisbane. Non-origin player elsewhere.Pieman wrote:Wallace.... ?? Not sure why you included him there.
Buhrer's best football is in a Manly jersey. Barnett is a low tier 2nd row plodder. He has never played a good level of footy.Pieman wrote:In the current knights side - Jamie Buhrer was playing well before injury. Mitch Barnett goes alright too. There ya go mate. Soon to be Aiden Guerra too.
QED. End of.