by Welshy Fri Jan 20, 2017 2:25 am
Rabbit wrote:Yep. I suppose that's what I'm saying. My mates had Croker, Rapana, one had BJ and they both had the two El cheapo hookers. Remember how much they cost, compared to my two?
Try 750k difference. Ouch. They didn't lose too much in HKR over the year and killed me in the backs, where I missed all the hooker boats (there was Garvey as well I think) and I gambled on a few cheap backs and a couple of mid range forwards that really fkd me over. The cheapy hookers ended up too expensive by the time I woke up. My point is, you can do well without a gun hooker these days I think. And a lot of arse. Lol. They did. I watched their teams closely every week and it pissed me right off. I stuck staunchly with my million dollar hookers and failed. The game has definitely changed. There doesn't seem to be explanation for some scores. I'm thinking King and maybe Mcinnes this year and stack everywhere else. I probably won't though :-)
Nice to have a genuine fantasy discussion Rabs
I do know what you are saying mate all i was adding that there is more risk involved in the hooking spot due to less manouvability in comparison with other spots, problem you probably had as well was being reluctant in dumping your gun hookers for the quick cash makers like Garvey and Parcell when he got the gig full time, and not many fantasy stalwarts would of tbh.
I got lucky and jumped on the Gravy and Parcell train and it probably saved my season because i was struggling for cash early when LAM and another failed.
Been looking more into McInnes lately and his numbers when he plays 60+ mins are fantastic, if Seggy comes in cheapish I may start with that pair and get BJ + SioneMat in the CTR with Teddy, RTS and Hayne in the WFB