L-Jimmy wrote:
It's nothing on Friend at 94
So you have Friend as your captain.
NRL Fantasy Fanatics - A place for discussion of NRL Fantasy / Virtual Sports / Super Coach and other Fantasy Sports
L-Jimmy wrote:
It's nothing on Friend at 94
White Lightning wrote:
So you have Friend as your captain.
White Lightning wrote:Anyone ballsy enough to go without Tedesco. I've seen a few teams who have.
White Lightning wrote:Anyone ballsy enough to go without Tedesco. I've seen a few teams who have.
L-Jimmy wrote:
It's nothing on Friend at 94
White Lightning wrote:Anyone ballsy enough to go without Tedesco. I've seen a few teams who have.
Milchcow wrote:
I am tossing up whyether to have him or not.
Conflicted between more tries at the Roosters, vs Less involvement in attack now that he is playing in a team that won't rely on him.
Plus frees up lots of cash to go without
Milchcow wrote:
Some new round 1 predicted lineups
https://www.foxsports.com.au/nrl/nrl-premiership/every-nrl-clubs-predicted-round-1-lineup/news-story/6dcae9d48488d87ae459d79060067f46
Milchcow wrote:
Some new round 1 predicted lineups
https://www.foxsports.com.au/nrl/nrl-premiership/every-nrl-clubs-predicted-round-1-lineup/news-story/6dcae9d48488d87ae459d79060067f46
Milchcow wrote:
Some new round 1 predicted lineups
https://www.foxsports.com.au/nrl/nrl-premiership/every-nrl-clubs-predicted-round-1-lineup/news-story/6dcae9d48488d87ae459d79060067f46