Pookus McFly wrote:
Pearce just did too well last year. Don't see why he won't have another great season, but I don't think he can beat his 56 average at the knights.
He raised his own bar too high IMO
+1
NRL Fantasy Fanatics - A place for discussion of NRL Fantasy / Virtual Sports / Super Coach and other Fantasy Sports
Pookus McFly wrote:
Pearce just did too well last year. Don't see why he won't have another great season, but I don't think he can beat his 56 average at the knights.
He raised his own bar too high IMO
Pookus McFly wrote:
I am running Thompson in the 13 with Katoa as my WFB backup in 18-21. Fullbacks can almost be exempt from team performance, they can still make plenty of run metres on kick returns, and if they are good enough, they can use that space to make the tacklebreaks too. He obviously won't hold a candle to Teddy, but I don't see why he can't make consistent 30s in a lacklustre Tigers outfit and be of solid economical value.
Shooter McGavin wrote:You guys don't think he'll get some good kick metres with Watson/Ponga/Levi-Griffin as other spine members?
Even then I guess 824k is pretty heavy money for a half..Maybe Ill go Cronk or C.Walker instead
Milchcow wrote:
Its Jaelen Feeny, rather than Teddy, I was comparing Thompson too.
But fullback is not necessarily a magic point machine. Lachlan Coote, Darius Boyd play for good teams and don't set the world on fire.
Thompson is cheap, but there is a difference between scoring well enough to make money, and scoring well enough to count in your 17. My concern is he scores poorly over the first few rounds as Tigers get belted, then Lolohea comes in
Shooter McGavin wrote:
if Lolohea comes in, having fixed his weak points and shafts Thompson could he be moved to the Wing and potentially push MWZ or Kev to reggies? Or it that just classic wishful thinking?
Welshy wrote:
Cheers mate, was considering the unthinkable in regards to a universally laughed at fantasy option at the the Titans....
MilfordTheMagician wrote:Seems like not many have JT. I currently have him in my side because he's underpriced for what he can produce. I'd rather pay almost 200k less for him than get Pearce.
Shooter McGavin wrote:
if Lolohea comes in, having fixed his weak points and shafts Thompson could he be moved to the Wing and potentially push MWZ or Kev to reggies? Or it that just classic wishful thinking?
Shooter McGavin wrote:Milchcow wrote:
Its Jaelen Feeny, rather than Teddy, I was comparing Thompson too.
But fullback is not necessarily a magic point machine. Lachlan Coote, Darius Boyd play for good teams and don't set the world on fire.
Thompson is cheap, but there is a difference between scoring well enough to make money, and scoring well enough to count in your 17. My concern is he scores poorly over the first few rounds as Tigers get belted, then Lolohea comes in
if Lolohea comes in, having fixed his weak points and shafts Thompson could he be moved to the Wing and potentially push MWZ or Kev to reggies? Or it that just classic wishful thinking?
mulvy wrote:
He found his way into my side over the weekend. Haven't figured out how to pay for him though.
mulvy wrote:
I don't think I can do it. He'll get two games where they get pumped by the roosters and storm and then he'll get dropped for Lolohea. Will be the next Feeney.
Milchcow wrote:
Its Jaelen Feeny, rather than Teddy, I was comparing Thompson too.
But fullback is not necessarily a magic point machine. Lachlan Coote, Darius Boyd play for good teams and don't set the world on fire.
Thompson is cheap, but there is a difference between scoring well enough to make money, and scoring well enough to count in your 17. My concern is he scores poorly over the first few rounds as Tigers get belted, then Lolohea comes in
MilfordTheMagician wrote:Seems like not many have JT. I currently have him in my side because he's underpriced for what he can produce. I'd rather pay almost 200k less for him than get Pearce.
Milchcow wrote:
Tigers have a lot of 'depth' in the backline, or at least quite a few players who maintain a base level of competency. Other than Nofo, I'm not sure any of them have complete job security.
Lolohea, Fonua, Milne could all force their way into first grade without it being a surprise. Ideally Milne would lock down a centre spot, because fantasy-wise he is the best prospect
Its certainly possible we might see Lolohea at 1 at Thompson on the wing at some point. I think most people are just hoping Thompson makes a bit of cash quick enough to allow him to be traded out at a decent profit.
Right On Milchcow
Pookus McFly wrote:
Different styles of play though. Coote and Boyd both have great passing games and chime into the set plays as an extra man. From what I saw of Thompson in the trials he likes to run it more. Players like that can be in average teams and still score well- Walker, Hopoate, RTS. He doesn't need to be a point machine at that price anyway, so my only real concern is his being replaced by Lolohea. No doubt the Tigers will get flogged a few times with their hard opening draw, but he could still play well in those drubbings and keep his spot. I have a solid WFB/CTR DPP in the CTR and both a CTR and WFB on the pine to replace him if catastrophe strikes, but for me he is well worth the punt over somebody like Hiku, who could also be gone for Beale come round 4. With Teddy and Ponga in the backs, running another 500k+ player would ruin my side, and cheaper pickings a slim in that position. If ya gonna go cheap, may as well go dirt cheap!
mulvy wrote:
Even if he did he would now be on the wing of the team with the hardest draw and favourites for the spoon. He won't even make his breakeven of 15. Although if I don't pick him he will probably be a superstar. Just my opinion.
mulvy wrote:
Even if he did he would now be on the wing of the team with the hardest draw and favourites for the spoon. He won't even make his breakeven of 15. Although if I don't pick him he will probably be a superstar. Just my opinion.
Welshy wrote:Woke up with MAubbs in the CTR
which is better
MAubbs + starting Thompson/Kennar/Hiku/Katoa
Kata + Inglis