Moose wrote:My team is fucked. Might trade in Fergo and Duges and start drinking some breezers on the roof.
Could always bring in SKD, Bromwich and Procter and make snow angels
NRL Fantasy Fanatics - A place for discussion of NRL Fantasy / Virtual Sports / Super Coach and other Fantasy Sports
Moose wrote:My team is fucked. Might trade in Fergo and Duges and start drinking some breezers on the roof.
Goodnight Kiwi wrote:Double trading for the 3rd week in a row
Nicholls --> Rochow
Carty --> TMK
Feel these are sound moves? Would then have 'most' the cows and barring injuries can hold tight for at least a few weeks (heres hoping).
Milchcow wrote:
In a 15 minute stint, someone could have 7 defensive sets or 2, depending on how many penalties, tries, errors happen in that part of the game.
SI wrote:
Half your starting 13 were Guns last year mate It could be killing it very soon.
I like the trade, with your 500k bank that gets you close to 700k and potentially the same points.
Let Iapalli rot there for loophole purposes.
If you are feeling brave you could upgrade Carty to Matterson and still have 450 odd k in the bank for next week. It's a risk with Matterson but the rewards are good if he continues to start. If you want to hold Carty then maybe upgrade Sao, still leaves you close to 400k next week (if my maths is right).
You could also fuck Nicholls off instead as will need injuries to start again you'd think, just eats even further into your bank is all.
The second line is the exact reason more minutes are important to an extent, some player are explosive and don't need them, that's a givenMilchcow wrote:
On a week to week basis, minutes played are not necessarily a useful gauge of anything.
In a 15 minute stint, someone could have 7 defensive sets or 2, depending on how many penalties, tries, errors happen in that part of the game.
And many players don't benefit from longer game time. Nathan Brown is a good example, his 60 minute scores are pretty much the same as his 80 minute scores.
Matterson now and wait on the others, Pearce falling, Hunt splitting duties and JT re-working his Morgan comboBlakejr1 wrote:JT,Matterson, Hunt or Pearce ? which half do i trade in
Welshy wrote:
Matterson now and wait on the others, Pearce falling, Hunt splitting duties and JT re-working his Morgan combo
R1 - 58 named on benchBlakejr1 wrote:
How many min has Matterson been playing?
Welshy wrote:
R1 - 58 named on bench
R2 - 80 starter on edge - possibly only played 80 because of injuries to Tupou and then Aubbs
R3 - 80 starter on edge
mulvy wrote:Thoughts on Nicholls to Rochow to get the cash making going again. What's the consensus on job security and average going forward?
Blakejr1 wrote:JT,Matterson, Hunt or Pearce ? which half do i trade in
Well thought out and good response and all points agreed with minus probably the Lamb KM stealingSI wrote:
Pearce' on field form doesn't seem to be translating to those 60's from last year and highest BE of those you mentioned. Watson wasn't kicking so with Lamb there now Pearce may lose some KM's.
Bhunt would make me nervous every week with Widdop. Widdop's KM's went up sharply last week and Bhunts dropped.
JT I'm not sold on at all this year personally.
I'm on the Matterson train as he could average 50 but at a cheaper price than the above. But if you want the security then I'd probably go BHunt.
SI wrote:Haha, what Welshy said in 10 times less words than me
Welshy wrote:Well thought out and good response and all points agreed with minus probably the Lamb KM stealingSI wrote:
Pearce' on field form doesn't seem to be translating to those 60's from last year and highest BE of those you mentioned. Watson wasn't kicking so with Lamb there now Pearce may lose some KM's.
Bhunt would make me nervous every week with Widdop. Widdop's KM's went up sharply last week and Bhunts dropped.
JT I'm not sold on at all this year personally.
I'm on the Matterson train as he could average 50 but at a cheaper price than the above. But if you want the security then I'd probably go BHunt.
Matterson moves into the middle a fair bit as well which is always good
Matterson also under 2% ownershipSI wrote:
Yeah, fair call, Pearce by far the dominant half in any set up. I'm very interested to see if Lamb takes a bit of it on now!