Averages 48 when playing over 35 mins and 54 when playing over 40 mins which is keeper level (Stats from 2018 and 2017). Gavet averaged 38 minutes at starting prop last year so 50 points should be expected.
What am i missing?
NRL Fantasy Fanatics - A place for discussion of NRL Fantasy / Virtual Sports / Super Coach and other Fantasy Sports
SI wrote:
Ah sorry, didn’t realise you were in L7. Although totes makes sense you’re in the pissheads League
Cash Comp is for both, first prize was $850 last year, total pool was $1650. We are donating 20% to Charity in Memorium of R0bdOg. Weren’t you in it last year?
Generally not when playing prop, he used to when he was on an edge. There’s also a bit of uncertainty around the way he will he used this year.Ponga for prez wrote:
But when he is fully fit, doesn't he play 80? last year i believe he averaged over 50.
Drifterspence wrote:To those not running with LAM what is your reason for not having him?
Averages 48 when playing over 35 mins and 54 when playing over 40 mins which is keeper level (Stats from 2018 and 2017). Gavet averaged 38 minutes at starting prop last year so 50 points should be expected.
What am i missing?
Chewie wrote:
Maybe LAM isn't a trap this season? There's been chat about him having increased minutes for the last few years which didn't really eventuate, maybe this year is different. Feel free to take a punt
The Warriors props minute share and he’s been a bit of a trap in the past. Front row pickings are slim though so I’ve got him anywayDrifterspence wrote:To those not running with LAM what is your reason for not having him?
Averages 48 when playing over 35 mins and 54 when playing over 40 mins which is keeper level (Stats from 2018 and 2017). Gavet averaged 38 minutes at starting prop last year so 50 points should be expected.
What am i missing?
SoylentGreen wrote:Who is Mitchell Dunn (Cowboys player)? - and why is he 358k?
Drifterspence wrote:
Fairly new to this so just assumed I was missing something, thanks for the feedback.
I like it. With no reasoning other than guesswork and hoping that’s what I came up with.my tv broke wrote:Similar to the "top 8 prediction" thread, why don't we have a comp (thread) to predict a set of players averages, say 10 contentious/highly discussed players. +1 point for every point off you are, totalled up.
Maybe conclude it after 10 rounds or something, so we aren't all waiting til end of season..
Here's 10: Napa 32, Kahu 21, TPJ 47, Macca 54, Cook 59, B Moz 33, Murray 61, Holland 45, Watson 42, Mahoney 47
Chewie wrote:
Great banter 51...
I mean...SI
Careful that you don’t pull your shoulder out patting yourself on the back, there’s another thread full of talk about it.KalkadoonWarrior wrote:
Yeah myself and I think from memory one other person on this forum were the only ones to know this would happen. I honestly didn’t think it would happen in under a week, but this is a big money game and just as we see teams relentlessly cheating the cap, people using this new rule as a weapon was inevitable. On a side note to that, does anyone know the last time we had a salary cap cheating free year??? I know there was some years they didn’t find them out immediately but found out later on... which still means that was a cheating year. Be interested to know if anyone has the footy smarts to answer.
Chewie wrote:
The difference this season is that he's a Warrior, which could see increased minutes.
The following post from @Alfie will give you a bit more background:
Warriors
8. LAM 45
9. Luke 65
10. Paasi 40
11. Pap 80
12. Harris 80
13. Blair 60
14. Tevaga 40
15. Afoa 25
16. Lisone 25
17. Burr 20
After an insane 91 without a try last year, Big Leeson looks like he should enjoy a reasonable minute increase. However does his playing style and impact change now that he’s starting and not coming on fresh mid-game. Also, the warriors props rarely played more than 50 mins. Does that change? Isaiah Papalii is another player that could provide value given he averaged well over his 39 average when playing the 80. Jazz Tevaga could be a good POD this year as well after he went to another level in 2018. The stocky workhorse could get a look in for the 9 or 13 jersey if Issac Luke isn't fit for round 1 or Jazz outdoes his teammates in pre-season. Sidenote: if Lachlan Burr gets a look at the 13 jersey, he would definitely be popular given his workhorse rep and his cash cow price.
filthridden wrote:
Do you call him 51 because that's how much higher in the NRL FF rankings he finished than you?
Same. It’s more than feel with Morgan I think I can’t think of one logical reason not to start him.SI wrote:
I didn’t pick Croft last year based on gut feel. I’m picking Morgs based on gut feel.
filthridden wrote:Chewie wrote:
Great banter 51...
I mean...SI
Do you call him 51 because that's how much higher in the NRL FF rankings he finished than you?
Krump wrote:I spent 12 hours today dicking around with my front row and just can’t find any combination I’m happy with. So answer me this fanatics, what profile front row are you all running? At the moment I’ve got a gun, mid and cow for cover being Fifi, LAM and Napa.