NRL Fantasy 2019 Part 10

Mighty Fishes wrote:

StuDogg101 wrote:

I remember my first season I was in a latecomers league and it was League 9. But I can't remember if we ever hit double figures

Im hoping Sportal never made 10. It'd be great if we surpassed it

SI wrote:

I haven't seen an avatar that amazing since Garden Chair.

SI wrote:

Sportal definitely 100% didn't hit 10 Leagues of 16

We did have one year where we had 12 team Leagues, potentially the first year that FanHub took over (2014)?  Which meant we got to an L9 or maybe L10, but not with 16 in each, only 12.  Of course once first lock out came FanHub decided they weren't going to list 12 man teams on the official ranking list (even though it was an option before Lockout) so as a result, we weren't on the Site Rankings list that whole season  

I'm pretty sure I listed where we are at on Sportal the first year here so might go have a looksee tomorrow.  What I can say is that we have NEVER had 160 in the Leagues  




We may have got to 144, but I think it was 128.

Milchy wrote:

With a first grade fullback average of 44, and an ISP average of 57, I think Hughes has locked himself in my team.

Looks like there is certainly the possibility of scores in the 20s, but that is true of basically all fullbacks, and I think the high scores will average themselves out.

Milchy wrote:

With a first grade fullback average of 44, and an ISP average of 57, I think Hughes has locked himself in my team.

Looks like there is certainly the possibility of scores in the 20s, but that is true of basically all fullbacks, and I think the high scores will average themselves out.

Krump wrote:

StuDogg101 wrote:The promotion shows just how good this site is. I don't think this community is going to be to everyone's taste because some people just like being dicks to each other for entertainment. The insulting and combative conversations here are usually in jest as opposed to other sites where anything is fair game. The loose restrictions around language etc has actually resulted in it being abused less than when it resulted in an insta-ban (3 strikes?) a la Sportal.

TL;DR the camaraderie is what puts this place above any others

It's baffled me a little that an anonymous platform is so much more social than Facebook, it gives me hope for the world.
As much as any platform with SI can be truely anonymous.

Krump wrote:
How'd you manage to have a 14-21 no better than Randoms without spending any money on your first 13?

Mulvy wrote:

I couldn't figure it out. I got this when I googled his username:

Mulvy wrote:

SI wrote:

I haven't seen an avatar that amazing since Garden Chair.

I couldn't figure it out. I got this when I googled his username:

Mulvy wrote:

Ha, I'm not sure if that's a compliment or shade?

Krump wrote:

Mulvy wrote:

I couldn't figure it out. I got this when I googled his username:

That's pretty cool. Might have a new avatar tomorrow

SoylentGreen wrote:Am I crazy for considering Sironen? He's at a decent discount, and it's not as if Manly are swimming in options.

Cookie Monster wrote:

Rapture_NRL wrote:

Can't remember who it was but there was a pretty intense Avatar bet disagreement last year pretty sure someone went off line for a while afterwards too

It was Moose and Rabbit. They somehow managed to end up betting for the same result. Needless to say, it didn't end well.

Mulvy wrote:

I think he's everyone's super secret POD. Every time I mention him, no one takes me seriously.

Krump wrote:
The numbers are certainly there. You don't have any worries about Bellamy screwing with the spine like last year? Munster would look very good in Billy's 1 full time.

Mulvy wrote:

I couldn't figure it out. I got this when I googled his username:

Milchy wrote:
North Queensland vs Storm trial stats

https://www.nrlfantasyfanatics.com/t807-2019-trial-stats#260056

Probably the last game I'll do.
Manly vs Roosters is around but a lot of first graders missing. Might put the Manly stats up if I get time tomorrow