Welshy wrote:
45 will do me mate
yeah that's probably a good knock
NRL Fantasy Fanatics - A place for discussion of NRL Fantasy / Virtual Sports / Super Coach and other Fantasy Sports
Welshy wrote:
45 will do me mate
Rabbits21 wrote:
He will be on the Roosters left wing I’m pretty sure. You can put anyone there and they’ll fall over the try line. The Roosters have a soft first 10 rounds too.
At worst he avg around 37 and that’s still around 8 points upside. It’s a POD move but it could pay off.
Ikavalu had an avg of 47-48 I think on that wing.
The Pascoe Fiasco wrote:
Is he though? Has either club made an announcement yet? If it has actually happened it is very strange. The big question is why does Manly want another 2RF or why would an up and coming 2RF want to go to a club with so much competition from a club with next to no competition.
The Dolphin Conspiracies wrote:Here is an interesting proposition? What if Will Smith has been selected to play the small LOCK role replacing Peachey from last year. Towards the end of the game TINO may spend some time in PROP. Lisone does not have a big motor and they are carrying two HOK, which means there are some minutes hanging around in that pack. Priced at 19. Could be an astute CASH COW, depending on how the game is managed in the next trial. I don't think he would have left Parra to have a just as minimal role with the Titans
my tv broke wrote:
I think he's more of an 'average 23.2 in 34.7 mins' kind of guy
rhinoceroo wrote:
I'd go with Angus for combination of DPP, price, job security and ceiling but there may be some Roosters specs involved there.
However, my choice (if I run Cleary) more likely to be between Angus, Cook and Fifita and leaning towards Cook.
Radley is a dead set weapon of a player, any team would happily put him in at 13, however his fantasy scores suffer a lot from being a link man in the roosters attack. He doesn't run the ball as much as other 13s, and he is very prone to getting suspended.GarethEllisismyDad wrote:I really like the look of Victor Radley,
Is there something glaringly obvious that I’m not considering
The article on “nrl fantasy game theory “ on amateur fantasy sports dot com was a great read that helped me draft my squad
(Can’t link it due to lack of posts)
Finger Puppet Mafia wrote:
True. In regards to Cleary he had a breakout year in 2020 averaging 73 points. A whopping 73. Fuck a duck! His previous best was a 54 point average the year before in 2019. Surely 2021 could top to a 73 point average.
The Dolphin Conspiracies wrote:
I would say that the uber guns with the best potential to go larger are both flying under the radar with Papalli (10%) and McInnes (6%) ownership.
They would only need to repeat their previous performance to go larger and there is very little risk if any of them go under their scoring from last year. That is my C and VC sewed up and I still have the capacity to afford other guns and people I am predicting to rise to gun status over the year.
The stat that screams Cleary regressing is that his base stats barely rose last year (thanks for sharing whoever did that) Add that to the likelihood that he is regression is likely to start from Round 2 or 3, then the decision is so easy.
Finger Puppet Mafia wrote:Odd how we think that players that have amazing year can only go down rather than push on, yet players that have an off year are sure to go up.
Are our Fantasy minds set to think that a fallen gun is great value and as such "must go up" thus being a great pick. In return a player with a breakout season "must come down" to allow us to justify picking them up at a cheaper price, rather than paying in full.
GarethEllisismyDad wrote:I really like the look of Victor Radley,
Is there something glaringly obvious that I’m not considering
The article on “nrl fantasy game theory “ on amateur fantasy sports dot com was a great read that helped me draft my squad
(Can’t link it due to lack of posts)
Regulator wrote:
I think in the case of Turbo, his season last year wasn't just amazing, it was historic. That may well be the most dominating stretch of attacking footy ever. So it's particularly hard to envision that getting maintained or better.
If that's going to be the norm for him, or if he can get even better, then we're going to be looking at one of the truly best people to ever play the game, because he was that good.
My strategy has been to make sure you have plenty of cover.Liverpool_Bulldog wrote:Hey guys. Just a quick draft related question, are there any resources based around strategy?
Eg do you stack your HOK/HLF/EDG position and then just go for whatever’s available at MID/CTR/WFB?
Or do you go a gun in each position except maybe CTR?
Any help would be appreciated, flick me a PM if you want to keep it today out here